Disposed¶21

D.Sivamani v. The Managing Director

Madras HC14 Oct 2025WP(MD)/28753/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Belated payment of terminal benefits; interest at 6% per annum; Gratuity; Provident Fund; Current Leave Salary; RBSR; writ of Mandamus; Article 226; Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Kovai) Ltd.; retirement dues; statutory interest; 8 weeks compliance; Madras High Court Madurai Bench; K.Kumresh Babu J; WP(MD) No.28753 of 2025; decided 14.10.2025; disposed with direction; no costs.

What did the court decide?

Respondents directed to pay interest at 6% per annum on the belated terminal benefits (Gratuity, Provident Fund, Current Leave Salary, RBSR) from the date of the petitioner's entitlement till the date of payment, within 8 weeks from receipt of a copy of the order; no order as to costs. ¶21

D.Sivamani Vs The Managing Director — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

WP(MD). No.28753 of 2025

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

Dated : 14.10.2025

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU

¶6

WP(MD). No.28753 of 2025

¶7

D.Sivamani, ... Petitioner

¶8

¶9

The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Kovai) Ltd., No.37, Mettupalayam Road, Coimbatore-641 043.

¶10

The General Manager, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Kovai) Ltd.,

¶11

Coimbatore Region, Mettupalayam Road, Coimbatore-641 043.

¶12

PRAYER:- Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to settle the interest at the rate of 6 percent per annum for the belated payment of petitioners terminal benefits including Gratuity, Provident Fund, Current Leave Salary, and RBSR full amount from the date of the petitioner's retirement to till the date on which the said benefits were settled to him, within the time frame fixed by this Court.

¶13

1/4

¶14

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶15

WP(MD). No.28753 of 2025

¶16

For Petitioner : Mr.S. Prasanth,

¶17

For Respondents : Mr.K.Ramaiah, Standing Counsel

¶18

ORDER

¶19

This writ petition has been filed for a writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to settle the interest at the rate of 6 percent per annum for the belated payment of petitioners terminal benefits including Gratuity, Provident Fund, Current Leave Salary, and RBSR full amount from the date of the petitioner's retirement to till the date on which the said benefits were settled to him.

¶20

Considering the admitted fact that there has been a delay in payment, the petitioner is entitled to statutory interest as provided under law.

¶21

In view of the same, the writ petition stands disposed of. The respondents are directed to pay interest at the rate of 6% per annum on the belated terminal benefits payable to the petitioner from the date of his 2/4

¶22

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶23

WP(MD). No.28753 of 2025

¶24

entitlement till the date of his payment within a period of 8 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No order as to costs.

¶25

14.10.2025

¶26

NCC :Yes/No Index :Yes/No LS

¶27

¶28

The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Kovai) Ltd., No.37, Mettupalayam Road, Coimbatore-641 043.

¶29

The General Manager, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Kovai) Ltd., Coimbatore Region, Mettupalayam Road, Coimbatore-641 043.

¶30

3/4

¶31

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶32

WP(MD). No.28753 of 2025

¶33

K.KUMARESH BABU,J

¶34

¶35

WP(MD) No.28753 of 2025

¶36

14.10.2025

¶37

4/4

¶38

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

D.Sivamani v. The Managing Director

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

D.Sivamani v. The Managing Director

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

P.Mohamed Ali Vs The Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Kumbakonam) Ltd.

S.Vaigaimeenavan Vs The Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Madurai) Ltd.

M.Seeni Vs The Management of

N.Murugesan Vs The Principal Secretary to Government

Varadarajan K Vs The Principal Secretary to the Government

Paulvannan Vs The Additional Chief Secretary to Government