R.Adhimoolam v. The Commissioner
Case brief
What is this about?
Temple festival ritual rights; Purattasi festival 13.10.2025–15.10.2025; Valaimaram, Thoranam, Pandhal, Mavilai, Panthal; East Street vs Ammapatty Street dispute; Rajakula Agamudayar community; HR&CE Commissioner, Joint Commissioner (Dindigul), Assistant Commissioner (Theni); Board of Trustees constitution dispute pending in other writ petitions; Aatachatti Thiruvizha; painted clay horse procession; police bandobust at trustees' cost; Article 226 mandamus; ad hoc consensual arrangement creating no rights; W.P(MD)No.26886 of 2025 with W.M.P(MD)No.20878 of 2025; Madurai Bench of Madras High Court; G.R.Swaminathan J; decision dated 10.10.2025.
What did the court decide?
Writ petition disposed of without costs by recording an ad hoc consensual arrangement for the 2025 Purattasi festival alone: East Street residents to tie Mavilai/Thoranam and erect Panthal at the East, West and South doors; Ammapatty Street residents given charge of the North door; East Street permitted to hold the Aatachatti Thiruvizha on 14.10.2025; Rajakula Agamudayar community permitted to carry the painted horse; Jeyamangalam police to provide bandobust at the trustees' cost; connected miscellaneous petition closed.