Petitioner sought a G Card under Regulation 17(3) CBLR 2013 with exemption from oral examination. The court directed the customs authorities to consider and dispose of her representation within eight weeks, without going into merits.
Respondents directed to dispose of petitioner's representation within eight weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P(MD)No.26596 of 2025
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 25.09.2025
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN
W.P(MD)No.26596 of 2025
Sahayamary
... Petitioner
Vs.
Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of
India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st and 2nd respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated
21.10.2024 to issue “G Card” in terms of Regulation 17(3) of CBLR,
2013 without insisting on passing oral examination.
For Petitioner : Mr.Hari Radhakrishnan,
For Respondents : Mr.R.Gowri Shankar
1/4
W.P(MD)No.26596 of 2025
Heard both sides.
ORDER
2.The writ petitioner seeks issuance of G Card in terms of Regulations 17(3) of CBLR 2013.
3.The petitioner has given a representation in this regard. The petitioner wants exemption from passing oral examination. It is the competent authority who has to consider the same.
4.Without going into the merits of the matter, I direct the respondents to dispose of the writ petitioner's representation, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
5.This writ petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs.
25.09.2025
NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No ias
2/4
W.P(MD)No.26596 of 2025
To:
Tuticorin – 628 004.
3/4
W.P(MD)No.26596 of 2025
G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J.
ias
W.P(MD)No.26596 of 2025
25.09.2025 (6/22)
4/4
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the respondents should consider the petitioner's representation seeking issuance of a G Card under Regulation 17(3) CBLR 2013 without insisting on oral examination.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Sahayamary
The Commissioner of Customs, Tuticorin
The Assistant Commissioner Of Customs (CBLR), Tuticorin
G.R.Swaminathan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
