Dismissed¶25

Raja.S v. The State of Tamilnadu

Madras HC24 Nov 2025WP(MD)/26566/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

W.P.(MD) No.26566 of 2022; Madurai Bench of Madras High Court; Justice Abdul Quddhose; 24.11.2025; writ petition dismissed as infructuous; senior resident Department of Plastic Surgery Tirunelveli Medical College; Director of Medical Education Ref.No.60398/E3/1/2022 dated 28.10.2022; Article 226 certiorarified mandamus; State of Tamil Nadu Health and Family Welfare Department; no costs; connected W.M.P.(MD) No.20756 of 2022 closed.

What the court decided

AI extract

Raja.S Vs The State of Tamilnadu — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

W.P.(MD) No.26566 of 2022

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 24.11.2025

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE

¶6

W.P.(MD) No.26566 of 2022 and W.M.P.(MD) No.20756 of 2022

¶7

Dr.S.Raja ... Petitioner

¶8

-vs-

¶9

1.The State of Tamil Nadu rep.by its Principal Secretary to Government Health and Family Welfare Department Secretariat, Fort St.George Chennai-600 009

¶10

2.The Director of Medical Education Kilpauk, Chennai-600 010

¶11

3.The Director of Public Health and Preventive Medicine DMS Compound, Anna Salai Teynampet, Chennai-600 006

¶12

4.Dr.Choundappan 5.Dr.Sathya ... Respondents

¶13

_____________ Page 1 of 4_

¶14

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶15

W.P.(MD) No.26566 of 2022

¶16

PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for the records in Ref.No.

¶17

60398/E3/1/2022 dated 28.10.2022 passed by the 2^nd respondent and quash the same as illegal and consequently direct the 2^nd respondent to post the petitioner in the post of senior resident Department of Plastic Surgery, Tirunelveli Medical College, Tirunelveli, by displacing the non-service post graduate, namely, Dr.Choundppan / 4^th respondent.

¶18

For Petitioner : Mr.B.Kamalesh Ms.P.Selvakamatchi

¶19

For Respondents : Mr.S.Shaji Bino Special Government Pleader for R1 to R3 No appearance for R4 & R5

¶20

O R D E R

¶21

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the relief sought for in this writ petition has now become infructuous. He has also made an endorsement to that effect in the court bundle.

¶22

Page 2 of 4

¶23

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶24

W.P.(MD) No.26566 of 2022

¶25

2. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No

¶26

costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶27

24.11.2025