Allowed

Ar. Mothilal, v. The Managing Director

Madras HC23 Sept 2025WP(MD)/25630/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this writ petition filed under Article 226, the High Court directed the Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation to disburse the petitioner's eligible benefits including salary, gratuity, leave, and pension differences along with 6% interest within 12 weeks.

What did the court decide?

Release of eligible benefits including salary, gratuity, leave, pensions, and pension arrears with 6% interest within 12 weeks.

Ar. Mothilal, Vs The Managing Director — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

W.P.(MD).No.25630 of 2025

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 23.09.2025

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU

¶6

W.P.(MD)No.25630 of 2025

¶7

AR.Mothilal ...Petitioner

¶8

Vs.

¶9

1.The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (KMB) Limited, New Railway Station Road, Kumbakonam-612 001.

¶10

2.The General Manager, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (KMB) Limited, Karaikudi Region, Managiri Post, Maruthapathi, Karaikudi, Sivagangai District. ... Respondents

¶11

Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to disburse the petitioner's difference amount of Salary, Gratuity, Surrender Leave, Pensions, Pensions Arrears and to revise Pensions on the basis of 12 (3) Settlement, dated 04.01.2018 along with 6% interest and pass such further or other orders as this Court.

¶12

1/5

¶13

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶14

W.P.(MD).No.25630 of 2025

¶15

For Petitioner : Mr.K.Gokul For Respondents : Mr.K.Ramaiah Standing Counsel

¶16

ORDER

¶17

Mr.K.Ramaiah, learned Standing Counsel takes notice for the

¶18

respondents.

¶19

2. The present Writ Petition has been filed for a writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents to disburse the petitioner's difference amount of Salary, Gratuity, Surrender Leave, Pensions, Pensions Arrears and to revise Pensions on the basis of 12 (3) Settlement, dated 04.01.2018 along with 6% interest.

¶20

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the issue raised in this writ petition is covered by an earlier order passed by this Court and has placed reliance on the order made in W.P(MD)No.20522 of 2025 dated 29.07.2025.

¶21

2/5

¶22

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶23

W.P.(MD).No.25630 of 2025

¶24

4. The learned Standing Counsel for the respondents also does not dispute the said fact.

¶25

5. In view of the same, the respondents are directed to release the eligible benefits to the petitioner together with 6% interest from the due date till the date of disbursement, within a period of twelve (12) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶26

6. The writ petition stands disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶27

23.09.2025 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes BTR

¶28

To:

¶29

1.The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (KMB) Limited,

¶30

New Railway Station Road, Kumbakonam-612 001.

¶31

3/5

¶32

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶33

W.P.(MD).No.25630 of 2025

¶34

2.The General Manager, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (KMB) Limited, Karaikudi Region, Managiri Post, Maruthapathi, Karaikudi, Sivagangai District.

¶35

4/5

¶36

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶37

W.P.(MD).No.25630 of 2025

¶38

K.KUMARESH BABU, J.

¶39

BTR

¶40

W.P.(MD).No.25630 of 2025

¶41

23.09.2025

¶42

5/5

¶43

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Ar. Mothilal, v. The Managing Director

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ar. Mothilal, v. The Managing Director

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M.Kamaraj, Vs The Managing Director

T.Gnanavel Pandian, Vs The Managing Director

M.Muthukumar Vs The State of Tamil Nadu

K.Asokan Vs The Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Madurai) Ltd.

Karthikeyan S Vs The Managing Director

R.Loganathan Vs The Managing Director