Dismissed¶29

C.Anand Raj, v. the State of Tamil Nadu

Madras HC13 Feb 2025WP(MD)/25430/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Madras High Court, Madurai Bench; W.P.(MD) No.25430 of 2018; C.Anand Raj; organ allocation; human organs; transplant; CBI investigation; writ of mandamus; Article 226; NOTTO; TRANSTAN; petition withdrawn; dismissed as withdrawn; no order as to costs; Chief Justice K.R.Shriram; Justice V.Lakshminarayanan; 13.02.2025; no merits decided.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner permitted to withdraw; writ petition dismissed as withdrawn; no order as to costs. ¶29

Why is it important?

C.Anand Raj, Vs the State of Tamil Nadu — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

W.P.(MD) No.25430 of 2018

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 13.02.2025

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.K.R.SHRIRAM, CHIEF JUSTICE and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN

¶6

W.P.(MD) No.25430 of 2018

C.Anand Raj

... Petitioner

-vs-

1.The State of Tamil Nadu rep.by the Principal Secretary Health Department The State of Tamil Nadu Secretariat St.,George Fort Chennai-600 009

¶11

2.The Director (NOTTO) National Organ & Tissue Transplant Organization 4^th Floor, National Insurance of Pathology NIOP Building Safdarjung Hospital Campus New Delhi-110 029

¶12

3.The Member Secretary Transplant Authority of Tamil Nadu

¶13

___________ Page 1 of 5_

¶14

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶15

W.P.(MD) No.25430 of 2018

¶16

(TRANSTAN)

¶17

Tamil Nadu Multi Super Speciality Hospital Omanthoorar Estate

¶18

Anna Salai, Chennai-600 002

¶19

4.The Director Central Bureau of Investigation Plot No.5B, 6^th Floor CGO Complex Lodhi Road New Delhi-110 003

¶20

... Respondents

¶21

PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a writ of mandamus to direct the respondent no.4 to investigate the case relating to the serious violation of norms suppression of facts breach of protocol and fraud relating to allocation of human organs in the state of Tamil Nadu and take appropriate action in accordance with law within the time stipulated by this Court.

¶22

For Petitioner : Mr.R.Alagumani For Respondents : Mr.P.Thilakkumar Government Pleader for R1 No appearance for R2 Mr.V.Anil Kumar Standing Counsel for R3 Mr.M.Karunanithi Special Public Prosecutor for CBI Cases for R4

¶23

O R D E R

¶24

[Order of the Court was made by The Hon'ble CHIEF JUSTICE]

¶25

___________ Page 2 of 5_

¶26

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶27

W.P.(MD) No.25430 of 2018

¶28

Counsel for petitioner sought leave to withdraw the petition.

¶29

Writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as

¶30

to costs.

¶31

[K.R.SHRIRAM., C.J.] [V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN , J.]

¶32

13.02.2025 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No

¶33

krk

¶34

To: 1.The Principal Secretary, Health Department, Secretariat, St.,George Fort, Chennai-600 009.

¶35

2.The Director, Central Bureau of Investigation, Plot No.5B, 6^th Floor, CGO Complex, Lodhi Road,

¶36

___________ Page 3 of 5_

¶37

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶38

W.P.(MD) No.25430 of 2018

¶39

New Delhi-110 003.

¶40

___________ Page 4 of 5_

¶41

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶42

W.P.(MD) No.25430 of 2018

¶43

THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE and V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN, J.

¶44

krk

¶45

W.P.(MD) No.25430 of 2018

¶46

13.02.2025

¶47

___________ Page 5 of 5_

¶48

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

C.Anand Raj, v. the State of Tamil Nadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

C.Anand Raj, v. the State of Tamil Nadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mr.G.Kannan Vs the Principal Secretary to

Menaka Vs Karur Vysya Bank

Perinbam Vs The Authorized Officer

Jeyabal Velladurai T Vs The Authorized Officer

Traffic Dr.K.R.Ramaswamy Vs State Represented by

Senthilvadivel, Vs the Municipal Administrative