Petitioner sought patta for agricultural land in Subramaniapuram Village after a 2016 purchase, citing his application for mutation that was not acted upon. The court directed the second respondent to process the mutation application within three months after providing reasonable opportunity to interested persons.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P(MD)No. 25353 of 2025
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 17.09.2025
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY
W.P(MD)No. 25353 of 2025
Licmi Chand Singvi
... Petitioner
Vs
... Respondents
PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the second respondent to issue Patta in the petitioner's name for the property bearing Survey No.143- with an extent of 3.22.5 hectares (7 Acres and 97 Cents) -Punja Land situated at Subramaniapuram Village, Sattur Taluk, Virudhunagar District.
1/4
W.P(MD)No. 25353 of 2025
For Petitioner : Mr. R. Murugappan For Respondents : Mr.M.Muthumanikkam Government Advocate
O R D E R
By relying on a sale deed dated 30.05.2016 in favour of the petitioner and patta No.462 in the name of the petitioner's vendor, the petitioner had applied for mutation of patta in his name. Because the said request was not acted upon, the present Writ Petition has been filed.
2/4
W.P(MD)No. 25353 of 2025
copy of this order after providing a reasonable opportunity to the petitioner and any other persons interested in the property. No costs.
NCS : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No apd To 1. The Revenue Divisional Officer, The Revenue Divisional Office, Sattur, Virudhunagar District. 2. The Tahsildar/Zonal Deputy Tahsildar, Taluk Office, Sattur Taluk Virudhunagar District.
17.09.2025
3/4
W.P(MD)No. 25353 of 2025
SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY.,J.
apd
ORDER MADE IN
W.P(MD)No. 25353 of 2025
17.09.2025
4/4
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the second respondent should act on the petitioner's application for mutation of patta based on the sale deed and vendor's patta.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Licmi Chand Singvi
The Revenue Divisional Officer, Sattur, Virudhunagar District
The Tahsildar/Zonal Deputy Tahsildar, Taluk Office, Sattur Taluk Virudhunagar District
Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
