Dismissed¶34

Sridhar v. The Reserve Bank of India

Madras HC15 Sept 2025WP(MD)/25208/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Madras High Court, Madurai Bench | W.P.(MD)No.25208 of 2025 | Sridhar vs The Reserve Bank of India, The Authorized Officer & The Branch Manager, M/s. Equitas Small Finance Bank Limited | Article 226 certiorari against demand notice dated 18.12.2024 alleged arbitrary and illegal | dismissed as not pressed following petitioner counsel's endorsement (Mr.P.Krishnasamy) | no costs | connected W.M.P(MD)Nos.19758, 19760 & 19761 of 2025 closed | decided 15.09.2025 | Bench: Dr. Justice Anita Sumanth (author) and Justice C. Kumarappan | no merits adjudication; disposal record only, of limited precedential value.

What did the court decide?

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner made an endorsement to the effect that the petitioner does not wish to pursue the writ petition. ¶32

Sridhar Vs The Reserve Bank of India — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

W.P.(MD)No.25208 of 2025

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 15.09.2025

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH AND

¶6

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN

¶7

W.P.(MD)No.25208 of 2025 and

¶8

W.M.P(MD)Nos.19758, 19760 & 19761 of 2025

Sridhar

... Petitioner

Vs.

1.The Reserve Bank of India, No.6, Rajaji Road, Fort St. George,

¶13

Chennai.

¶14

2.The Authorized Officer,

¶15

M/s. Equitas Small Finance Bank Limited,

¶16

4^th Floor, Phase I, Spencer Plaza,

¶17

No.769, Mount Road, Anna Salai,

¶18

Chennai - 600 002.

¶19

3.The Branch Manager,

¶20

M/s. Equitas Small Finance Bank Limited, No.5, 3^rd Floor, Sri Nagar Arcade, William's Road, Cantonment,

Trichy - 620 001.

... Respondents

1/4

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶25

PRAYER:- Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of

¶26

W.P.(MD)No.25208 of 2025

¶27

PRAYER:- Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records pertaining to the impugned demand notice dated 18.12.2024 issued by the second respondent and quash the same on the ground that the same is arbitrary and illegal.

¶28

For Petitioner : Mr.P.Krishnasamy

¶29

ORDER

¶30

(Order of the Court was made by DR.ANITA SUMANTH, J.)

¶31

Mr.P.Krishnasamy, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner,

¶32

has made an endorsement to the effect that the petitioner does not wish to pursue this Writ Petition.

¶33

2.In view of the endorsement so made by the learned counsel