The Correspondent v. The State Tamil Nadu
Case brief
What is this about?
Madras High Court Madurai Bench | W.P.(MD)No.23311 of 2025 | writ of mandamus | Article 226 Constitution of India | approval of staff appointment | Night Watchan | aided minority school | corporate management Rome Catholic Schools Diocese of Kuzhithurai | District Educational Officer Marthandam | Chief Educational Officer Nagercoil | proposals dated 06.09.2021 and 06.10.2022 | appointment vis., 03.05.2021 | statutory authority duty to consider representation | dereliction of duty | consider within stipulated time | six weeks | no view expressed on merits | disposed of | no order as to costs | Justice M. Dhandapani | Kanyakumari District | N.Ratheesh Kumar.
What did the court decide?
Direction to the fourth respondent DEO to consider the petitioner's proposals dated 06.09.2021 and 06.10.2022 on their own merits and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law within six weeks from receipt of a copy of the order; Court expressly reserved its position on merits; writ petition disposed of with no order as to costs.