Dismissed

Alagarsamy v. Tamilnadu Construction Workers Welfare Board

Madras HC1 Sept 2025WP(MD)/22993/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Two writ petitions challenging a panel list and promotion list regarding a Superintendent post were withdrawn by the petitioner. The Madras High Court dismissed the writ petitions as withdrawn and closed connected miscellaneous petitions without costs.

What did the court decide?

Writ petitions dismissed as withdrawn. Connected miscellaneous petitions closed. No costs.

Alagarsamy Vs Tamilnadu Construction Workers Welfare… — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

W.P.(MD) Nos.22993 of 2019 & 14499 of 2020

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 01.09.2025

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE

¶6

W.P.(MD) Nos.22993 of 2019 & 14499 of 2020 and

¶7

W.M.P.(MD) Nos.19728 & 19729 of 2019 and 12145 & 12147 of 2020

¶8

W.P.(MD) No.22993 of 2019:

Alagarsamy

... Petitioner

-vs-

1.Tamilnadu Construction Workers Welfare Board rep.by its Secretary Valluvar Kottam High Road Nungambakkam, Chennai-34

¶13

2.The Assistant Commissioner of Labour Kanniyakumari at Nagercoil

¶14

3.Santhana Raj Assistant Tamilnadu Construction Workers Welfare Board Valluvar Kottam High Road Nungambakkam, Chennai-34

¶15

Page 1 of 5

¶16

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶17

W.P.(MD) Nos.22993 of 2019 & 14499 of 2020

¶18

4.Mekala Assistant (SSS) O/o.Assistant Commissioner of Labour Tiruppur

¶19

5.Josephine Jancy Assistant (SSS) O/o.Assistant Commissioner of Labour Salem ... Respondents

¶20

PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for the records of the impugned order in A1/26680/2018 dated 10.10.2019 issued by the first respondent and quash the same as illegal and consequently direct the 1^st respondent to revise the panel for the post of Superintendent to inclusion of the petitioner name in the appropriate place i.e. 11A between V.Muthukrishnan and 4^th respondent (N.Santhana Raj).

¶21

For Petitioner : Mr.RM.Arun Swaminathan For Respondents : Mr.V.Kannadasan for R1 Mr.A.Baskaran Additional Government Pleader for R2 No appearance for R3 to R5

¶22

W.P.(MD) No.14499 of 2020:

Alagarsamy

... Petitioner

-vs-

_____________ Page 2 of 5_

¶27

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶28

1.Tamilnadu Construction Workers Welfare Board rep.by its Secretary Valluvar Kottam High Road Nungambakkam Chennai-34

¶29

W.P.(MD) Nos.22993 of 2019 & 14499 of 2020

¶30

2.V.Nallappa Superintendent O/o.Assistant Commissioner of Labour (SSS) Tamilnadu Construction Workers Welfare Board Krishnagiri

¶31

3.K.Srinivasan Superintendent O/o.Assistant Commissioner of Labour (SSS) Tamilnadu Construction Workers Welfare Board Dharmapuri ... Respondents

¶32

PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue

¶33

a writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for the records of the impugned Panel list in No.A1/26680/2018 07.10.2020 and impugned promotion list by his proceedings No.A1/26680/2018-1 dated 07.10.2020 issued by the first respondent and quash the same as illegal and consequently direct the 1^st respondent to revise the panel for the post of Superintendent to inclusion of the petitioner name in the appropriate place i..e.11A.

¶34

_____________ Page 3 of 5_

¶35

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶36

W.P.(MD) Nos.22993 of 2019 & 14499 of 2020

¶37

For Petitioner : Mr.RM.Arun Swaminathan For Respondents : Mr.V.Kannadasan for R1

¶38

C O M M O N O R D E R

¶39

Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw these writ petitions. He has also made an endorsement to that effect in the Court bundle.

¶40

2. Accordingly, these writ petitions are dismissed as withdrawn.

¶41

No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

¶42

01.09.2025

¶43

NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No

¶44

krk

¶45

To: The Assistant Commissioner of Labour, Kanniyakumari at Nagercoil.

¶46

_____________ Page 4 of 5_

¶47

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶48

W.P.(MD) Nos.22993 of 2019 & 14499 of 2020

¶49

ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J.

¶50

krk

¶51

W.P.(MD) Nos.22993 of 2019 & 14499 of 2020 and

¶52

W.M.P.(MD) Nos.19728 & 19729 of 2019 and 12145 & 12147 of 2020

¶53

01.09.2025

¶54

_____________ Page 5 of 5_

¶55

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Alagarsamy v. Tamilnadu Construction Workers Welfare Board

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Alagarsamy v. Tamilnadu Construction Workers Welfare Board

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/s.Tata Capital Limited, Vs R.Hashika Shri Building Materials

M s Mahaveer Finance India Limited Vs Harish S

Cholamandalam Investment And Finance Co. Ltd. Vs Om Parkash D

Maheshwari.R Vs the Secretary

J.Angeline Vs The Prl. Secretary to Govt.

Angeline.J Vs The Chief Educational Officer