Kumar v. The Appellate Deputy Commissioner (Gst)
Indirect tax – GST recovery – Writ under Article 226 (Certiorarified Mandamus)
Case brief
What is this about?
GST recovery notice quashed; prior intimation to attachment; Form GST DRC 07 demand confirmation dated 14.02.2025 and 17.02.2025; Form GST DRC 01 show cause notice dated 25.10.2024 and 25.11.2024; assessment order passed without hearing; 25% of disputed tax pre-deposit in cash from Electronic Cash Register within 30 days; quashed orders treated as addendum to show cause notice; fresh adjudication after hearing; bank account defreeze / attachment lifted; deemed dismissal of writ petition on default; proceed under respective GST enactments and Rules; additional court fee; Article 226 Certiorarified Mandamus; Tuticorin III Assessment Circle; Thoothukudi; Madras High Court Madurai Bench; W.P(MD) 22871 of 2025; C. Saravanan J.; decision date 25.08.2025.
What did the court decide?
Writ petition disposed of: impugned recovery notices dated 24.07.2025 and 26.07.2025 quashed; assessment orders dated 14.02.2025 and 17.02.2025 also quashed, subject to deposit of 25% of disputed tax in cash from the Electronic Cash Register within 30 days; quashed orders treated as addendum to the show cause notices with a fresh order to be passed on merits after hearing; bank-account attachment lifted subject to the deposit; failure to comply deemed dismissal of the writ petition; no costs; connected miscellaneous petitions closed.