Iyem Perumal S v. The Commissioner
Case brief
What is this about?
Keywords: writ of mandamus; Article 226 Constitution of India; HR&CE Department; temple land lease; leasehold premises; borewell installation; electricity service connection; S.No.690/18 Padalayarkulam Village; Nanguneri Taluk; Tirunelveli District; Arulmigu Soundara Pandeeswarar Temple; Executive Officer counter-signature; representation dated 23.07.2025; fair rent; Section 34-A H.R. & C.E. Act; Angala Parameswari Division Bench decision; WP(MD)No.14703 of 2025; admitted arrears Rs. 14,400/- per month; fourth round of litigation; C.Saravanan J.; Madurai Bench Madras High Court; disposed 13.08.2025.
What did the court decide?
Permission to obtain electricity connection and to sink a bore well in the leasehold premises in S.No.690/18, Padalayarkulam Village, by obtaining necessary permission in the name of the fourth respondent Temple, with applications to be counter signed by the Executive Officer before filing; no costs.