Disposed¶21

Shanthi Nageshwaran, v. the State Settlement Officer

Madras HC8 Jan 2025WP(MD)/22181/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Madras High Court, Madurai Bench; W.P.(MD).No.22181 of 2017; Shanthi Nageswaram v. State Settlement Officer and others; writ of certiorari against settlement proceedings Na.Ka.No. 7017/2015/SET.E dated 19.10.2017; petition closed as infructuous due to subsequent rent-fixation order of 2019; liberty reserved to challenge subsequent order; no costs; K. Kumaresh Babu, J.; decided 08.01.2025.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition closed as infructuous with liberty to the petitioner to challenge the subsequent order (fixing rent in 2019) in a manner known to law; no costs; connected writ miscellaneous petition closed. ¶21

Shanthi Nageshwaran, Vs the State Settlement Officer — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

W.P.(MD).No.22181 of 2017

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 08.01.2025

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU

¶6

W.P.(MD).No.22181 of 2017 and W.M.P.(MD).No.18481 of 2017

Shanthi Nageshwaran

.. Petitioner

Vs.

1.The State Settlement Officer, O/o Survey and Settlement Department,

¶11

3^rd Floor, Survey House, Cheapuk, Chennai – 600 005.

¶12

2.The District Collector, Thanjavur.

¶13

3.The Thasildar, Chatram Management, Thanjavur District. .. Respondents

¶14

Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of Writ of Certiorari to call for the records pertaining to the respondent in his proceedings No.Na.Ka.No. 7017/2015/SET.E dated 19.10.2017.

¶15

_________Page 1 of 4

¶16

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶17

W.P.(MD).No.22181 of 2017

¶18

For Petitioner : Mr.R.M.Arun Swaminathan Advocate For Respondents : Mr.R.Suresh Kumar Additional Government Pleader

¶19

ORDER

¶20

Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the prayer sought for in the writ petition has become infructuous, in view of the subsequent order, fixing the rent in the year 2019. However, he seeks liberty to challenge the same in the manner known to law.

¶21

Recording the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, no further adjudication is required in this writ petition. Accordingly, this writ petition is closed as infructuous with a liberty to the petitioner to challenge the subsequent order in a manner known to law. No costs. Connected writ miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶22

08.01.2025

¶23

NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes nst

¶24

_________Page 2 of 4

¶25

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶26

W.P.(MD).No.22181 of 2017

¶27

¶28