Allowed¶30

P.Illamparithi v. The District Collector

Land Acquisition – RFCTLARR Act, 2013

Madras HC4 Sept 2025WP(MD)/21627/2025

Download

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

W.P(MD)No.21627 of 2025 (Madras High Court, Madurai Bench, 04.09.2025, G.R.Swaminathan J.) - compensation for partial land acquisition under RFCTLARR Act, 2013; superstructure/first-floor valuation; mandamus to value ground and first floors plus land and pay compensation before dispossession; NH-744A Maduruai land acquisition officials; no costs.

What did the court decide?

Writ of Mandamus issued: second respondent to value the building for the ground floor as well as the first floor, together with the land, and to pay compensation to the petitioner before dispossession. ¶30

P.Illamparithi Vs The District Collector — Land Acquisition | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

W.P(MD)No.21627 of 2025

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 04.09.2025

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN

¶6

W.P(MD)No.21627 of 2025

P.Illamparithi

... Petitioner

Vs.

1.The District Collector, Collectorate, Madurai District.

¶11

2.The Special District Revenue Officer, Madurai Ring Road, Land Acquisition - National Highway No.744A,

¶12

Collectorate, Madurai.

¶13

3.The Special Tahsildar, National Highway No.744A, Zone III, Madurai North Taluk, Madurai District.

¶14

4.The Divisional Engineer, National Highways, Madurai Division, No.5, Race Course Road, Chinna Chokkikulam, Madurai.

¶15

... Respondents

¶16

1/4

¶17

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶18

W.P(MD)No.21627 of 2025

¶19

Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 4 to provide adequate compensation with appropriate interest by re-measuring the property including superstructure of the petitioner in S.F.No.107/1 corresponding New T.S.No.107/8 in Block XXIII-B1 situated Kokkulappi Village, Madurai Corporation based on the petitioner's representation dated 08.07.2025.

¶20

For Petitioner : M/s.M.Viji

¶21

For Respondents : Mr.K.Balasubramani Special Government Pleader

¶22

ORDER

¶23

Heard both sides.

¶24

68 Sq.mts of land belonging to the writ petitioner have been

¶25

acquired under the Right to Fair compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. Even though a lesser extent of land alone is being acquired, the entire building situated on a larger extent has to be demolished. The building in question consists of both a ground floor as well as first floor. The ground floor measures 128.38 sq.mts and the first floor measures 100.5 sq.mts.

¶26

2/4

¶27

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶28

W.P(MD)No.21627 of 2025

¶29

The authorities are not right in holding that the first floor will not be valued. The first floor may be excluded in valuation only if it consists a terrace portion. But if there is a building in the first floor, then it has to be valued. I am not going into the valuation aspect. I am only directing the second respondent to value the building for the ground floor as well as the first floor and also the land in question and pay compensation to the writ petitioner before the writ petitioner is dispossessed.

¶30