Veeravanchinathan v. The District Collector
Case brief
What is this about?
Encroachment removal mandamus refused; Article 226 writ petition dismissed; Government land reclassified as Natham under re-survey and settlement; former European Quarters converted to Town Survey Nos.86 to 88; 9.60 acres; 188 patta beneficiaries identified; plots less than 3 cents; Revenue Standing Order 21 eligibility and compliance conditions; T.S.No.185 and subdivisions 185/1B, 185/1B1, 185/1H, 185/1B1H; K.Pudur, Tallakulam revenue Village, Madurai North Taluk, Madurai Corporation Ward No.16; respondents include District Collector, Assistant Commissioner Zone-II Madurai Corporation, Tahsildar Madurai North Taluk, Revenue Divisional Officer, and private parties Abdul Rahman, Irudhayadoss, Nellai Kumar, Padmini, Chinnadurai, Pushparaja, Mohan; no order as to costs; Madras High Court Madurai Bench; S.M. Subramaniam J. with G. Arul Murugan J.; decided 12.08.2025.
What did the court decide?
Since the lands have already been converted as Natham under the re-settlement, the beneficiaries have been identified and pattas are to be granted by the Government, the relief sought by the petitioner — premised on the lands belonging to the Government and requiring removal of encroachments — does not arise for consideration.