Disposed

Sindhuja R v. The Tahsildar

Madras HC4 Dec 2025WP(MD)/19992/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition seeking separate patta for the petitioner's land; a mention was raised correcting an earlier order that wrongly recorded her representation as rejected. The court substituted paragraphs directing the respondent to consider the pending representation within eight weeks after an enquiry and hearing, and disposed of the petition.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondent to consider representation dated 30.05.2023, hold enquiry with hearing, pass orders on merits within eight weeks; no costs.

Sindhuja R Vs The Tahsildar — Property and Title | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

W.P.(MD) No.19992 of 2023

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 09.02.2026

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.SURENDER

¶6

W.P.(MD) No.19992 of 2023

¶7

R.Sindhuja ... Petitioner Vs.

¶8

The Tahsildar, Cheranmahadevi Taluk Office, Tirunelveli District. ... Respondent

¶9

Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent to issue separate patta in the name of the petitioner for her land in Old S.No. 294/2A1 in New Natham Survey No.1094/27, Block No.14, Rasatha, Papakudi Village Bit-II, Cheranmahadevi, Ambasamuthiram, Tirunelveli District by considering the petitioner's representation dated 30.05.2023 within the time stipulated by this Court.

¶10

O R D E R

¶11

This case is listed today at the instance of the learned counsel for the petitioner under the caption “for being mentioned”.

¶12

Page No. 1 of 4

¶13

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶14

W.P.(MD) No.19992 of 2023

¶15

The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that by the proceedings dated 09.03.2024, the representation of a third party, namely, Shanmuganathan, dated 20.06.2023, seeking cancellation of patta, was rejected; that however, in the order dated 04.12.2025 passed in this Writ Petition, it has been wrongly stated as the petitioner’s representation had been considered and rejected; and that the petitioner’s representation dated 30.05.2023 is still pending consideration and therefore seeks appropriate orders from this Court.

¶16

In view of the above submissions and considering the undertaking given by the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondent that the petitioner’s representation will be considered and appropriate orders will be passed, Paragraph Nos.3 and 4 of the order dated 04.12.2025 are substituted with the following paragraphs:

¶17

“3. The learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondent would submit that the representation of the petitioner dated 30.05.2023 would be considered and appropriate orders would be passed within a period of eights weeks

¶18

____________ Page No. 2 of 4_

¶19

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶20

W.P.(MD) No.19992 of 2023

¶21

Recording the above submission and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the matter, this Writ Petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 30.05.2023 and pass appropriate orders on its merits and in accordance with law within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The representation shall be disposed of after conducting an enquiry. The respondent is also directed to provide a reasonable opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and any other interested parties who may be affected by such decision, before passing any order. There shall be no order as to costs.”

¶22

The Registry is directed to carry out the above correction and

¶23

issue a fresh copy of the order to the parties, if already issued.

¶24

[K.SURENDER, J.] 09.02.2026

¶25

JEN

¶26

____________ Page No. 3 of 4_

¶27

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶28

W.P.(MD) No.19992 of 2023

¶29

K.SURENDER, J.

¶30

JEN

¶31

W.P.(MD) No.19992 of 2023

¶32

09.02.2026

¶33

____________ Page No. 4 of 4_

¶34

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Sindhuja R v. The Tahsildar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sindhuja R v. The Tahsildar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Durai Pandi Vs The Revenue Divisional Officer

Jothiraj Vs The Assistant Collector

Chinnammal Vs The Thasildar

K.Alagusundaram Vs The District Collector

Thiraviyam Vs R.Alagumeena IAS

S.Muniyappan Vs Mahalakshmi