Disposed

Nn 627 Pethanenthal Primary v. the Asst.Provident Fund Commissioner

Madras HC25 Oct 2025WP(MD)/19670/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A cooperative society sought mandamus to restrain EPF recovery proceedings and to pay contribution arrears in installments. Interim directions allowed payment in six installments. The petitioner later paid the entire due amount of Rs.10,37,177/- to the EPF authority; recording this, the writ petition was closed as nothing survives.

What the court decided

AI extract

Nn 627 Pethanenthal Primary Vs the Asst.Provident Fund… — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

WP.(MD)No.19670 of 2021

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 25.10.2025

¶4

CORAM :

¶5

THE HON`BLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI

¶6

WP.(MD)No.19670 of 2021 and WMP.(MD)Nos.16339 & 16340 of 2021

¶7

NN 627 Pethanenthal Primary Agricultural Cooperative Society Ltd Rep.through its Secretary Poovanthi, Thiruppuvanam, Sivagangai 630 611.

¶8

... Petitioner

¶9

Vs.

¶10

The Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner Employees Provident Fund Organization Regional Office Bhavishya Nidhi Bhavan Chokkikulam Madurai 625 002. ... Respondent

¶11

Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus, to restrain the respondent from proceeding pursuant to the order under Section 8F of the EPF Act in No.TN/RO/MD/MDU/37664/Recovery/M-8/8F/2021 dated 22.07.2021 and direct the respondent to receive the arrears of contributions and the interest of Rs.9,32,833/- in 30 equal monthly installments.

¶12

1/8

¶13

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶14

WP.(MD)No.19670 of 2021

¶15

For Petitioner : Mr.V.O.S.Kalaiselvam For Respondent : Mr.K.Murali Shankar

¶16

ORDER

¶17

Earlier on 10.12.2021, when this matter was taken up

¶18

for hearing, this Court passed the following order:-

¶19

Heard Mr.V.O.S.Kalaiselvam, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr.K.Murali Shankar, learned counsel for the respondent.

¶20

2.When the matter was taken up for hearing on 08.12.2021, this Court has passed the following order:

¶21

“This writ petition is filed by the Secretary, NN627 Pethanenthal Primary Agricultural CoOperative Society Limited, Poovanthi, Thiruppuvanam, Sivagangai district for a mandamus to the respondent to receive the dues in installments and to restrain the respondent from proceeding further based on the direction to the Branch Manager, Sivagangai District Central Co-Operative Bank, Thiruppuvanam Branch, directing him to pay the dues from and out of the money lying in the account of the petitioner's

¶22

2/8

¶23

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶24

WP.(MD)No.19670 of 2021

¶25

Society to the respondent.

¶26

2.The learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that no doubt they have not remitted the EPF contribution of the employees with the respondent. It is a voluntary coverage made by the petitioner Society, though they are not having required staff strength of 20 employees. The learned Counsel further submits that the Society has suffered loss, due to mismanagement of the then Secretary of the Society and therefore, they are not in a position to remit the dues with the respondent. However, if the petitioner Society is permitted to pay the dues in installments, they would remit the same in six equal monthly installments, starting from 2nd January 2022. He has also submitted that in similar circumstances, this Court has passed such orders permitting the societies to pay the dues in monthly installments.

¶27

3.Further, the learned Counsel seeks indulgence of this Court to permit the petitioner Society to pay the amount collected from the farmers towards agricultural insurance, to the insurance company, and it has to be remitted before 10th December 2021. However, in view of the order passed by the respondent, the petitioner Society is not in a position to pay the amount to

¶28

3/8

¶29

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶30

WP.(MD)No.19670 of 2021

¶31

the insurance company.

¶32

4.In response to the above, the learned Counsel for the respondent objected to such a proposal made by the learned Counsel for the petitioner that there is no provision available under the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provision Act for the Department to accept the dues in installments.

¶33

5.This Court paid its anxious consideration to the rival submissions.

¶34

6.Considering the present situation that in view of the order passed by the respondent, the petitioner Society is not in a position to pay the insurance amount to the farmers and the petitioner's proposal to remit the EPF dues in six equal monthly installments, there shall be an interim direction to the respondent to permit the petitioner to pay the insurance amount to the insurance company and also agricultural loan to its members, subject to the filing of an undertaking affidavit by the petitioner Society before this Court on or 10.12.2021 that they would remit the EPF dues in six equal monthly installments with the respondent, first installment starting from 2nd January 2022.

¶35

7.List the matter on 10.12.2021.”

¶36

4/8

¶37

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶38

WP.(MD)No.19670 of 2021

¶39

3.The petitioner has also filed an additional affidavit on 09.12.2021 stating that he would pay a sum of Rs.9,32,833/- in six equal monthly installments, which starts from January 2nd of 2022 and he will remit the said amount on or before 2nd day of every month for six months to settle the contribution dues with interest.

¶40

4.Paragraph no.4 of the additional counter affidavit reads as under:

¶41

''4.It is most respectfully submitted that considering the same, in the interest of justice, this Court by an order while

¶42

granting interim-injunction against the prohibitory order issued by the respondent has directed the petitioner to remit the amount of Rs.9,32,833/-in six equal monthly instaliments, starts from January 2nd of 2022. The petitioner

¶43

with great respect abide by the order of this Court and sworn that the petitioner shall remit the amount on or before 2nd day of every month for six months to settle the contribution dues with interest.''

¶44

5.In view of the additional affidavit dated 09.12.2021, filed by the petitioner and the need of the petitioner in discharging its duties for disbursing the loan to the farmers by way of

¶45

5/8

¶46

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶47

WP.(MD)No.19670 of 2021

¶48

depositing the Insurance amount, for which they are collecting premium amount from the respective Insurance Companies, there shall be an order of interim injunction as prayed for.

¶49

6.Post the matter after six weeks.

¶50

2.Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the

¶51

learned counsel appearing for the petitioner/Society submits that the entire due amount of Rs.10,37,177/- was already paid by the petitioner/Society to the EPF authority.

¶52

3.Recording the above submission, this writ petition is closed as nothing survives. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

¶53

25.10.2025

¶54

NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet:Yes gns

¶55

6/8

¶56

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶57

WP.(MD)No.19670 of 2021

¶58

¶59

The Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner Employees Provident Fund Organization Regional Office Bhavishya Nidhi Bhavan Chokkikulam Madurai 625 002.

¶60

7/8

¶61

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶62

WP.(MD)No.19670 of 2021

¶63

B.PUGALENDHI,J

¶64

gns

¶65

WP.(MD)No.19670 of 2021

¶66

25.10.2025

¶67

8/8

¶68

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Nn 627 Pethanenthal Primary v. the Asst.Provident Fund Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Nn 627 Pethanenthal Primary v. the Asst.Provident Fund Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The Management Vs the Controlling Authority Under

The General Secretary, Vs The Labour Court

Dr.Radhakrishnan Vidhyalaya Matriculation Hr.Sec.School Vs the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner

The Management Vs The Joint Commissioner of Labour

The South Tamil Nadu Beedi Manufacturers Association Vs The Government of Tamil Nadu

Marthandam Bee Keepers Co-Operative Society Ltd. ,No. 2050 Vs Inspector of Labour