Disposed

G. Srinivasan v. The District Collector cum District Magistrate

Madras HC13 Oct 2025WP(MD)/1935/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition challenging eviction order under Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 disposed of after petitioner undertakes to vacate property by 1 May 2026; court restrains third respondent from disturbing possession until then.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner permitted to remain in possession until 1 May 2026; third respondent restrained from disturbing possession until that date.

G. Srinivasan Vs The District Collector cum District Magistrate — Madras HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

W.P.(MD) No.1935 of 2025

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 13.10.2025

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE P.T.ASHA

¶6

W.P.(MD) No.1935 of 2025 and W.M.P(MD).No.1382 of 2025

G.Srinivasan

... Petitioner

-vs-

1.The District Collector cum District Magistrate / Appellate Tribunal under the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007, Collectorate, Madurai - 625020.

¶11

2.The Revenue Divisional Officer cum Maintenance Tribunal Under the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007, The Revenue Divisional Officer, Madurai, Collectorate, Madurai - 625020.

¶12

3.G.Chandra ... Respondents

¶13

Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a

¶14

Writ of Certiorari calling for the records relating to the impugned order passed by

¶15

Page 1 of 4

¶16

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶17

W.P.(MD) No.1935 of 2025

¶18

the 1^st respondent in Moo.Mu.No.C6/2606244/2024 dated 06.11.2024 confirming the order passed in Na.Ka.No.2047/2024/A2 dated 11.09.2024 on the file of the 2^nd respondent and quash the same consequently allow this writ petition.

¶19

For Petitioner : Mr.Gopalan.TK For Respondents : Mr.D.Sasikumar Additional Government Pleader (for R1 & R2) Mr.C.Vakeeswaran (for R3)

¶20

O R D E R

¶21

This writ petition has been filed to quash the impugned order passed by the 1^st respondent in Moo.Mu.No.C6/2606244/2024 dated 06.11.2024 confirming the order passed in Na.Ka.No.2047/2024/A2 dated 11.09.2024 on the file of the 2^nd respondent, thereby the petitioner was directed to vacate the property in question and hand over the same to the third respondent.

¶22

Today i.e., on 13.10.2025, an undertaking affidavit has been filed by the petitioner, in which, it has been stated as follows:

¶23

“ 3. I hereby undertake that as my children's are studying Haran Dhivubai InderMalji Jain Mat.Higher Secondary School which is near to my present residence and their final written examination to be held in the month

¶24

Page 2 of 4

¶25

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶26

W.P.(MD) No.1935 of 2025

¶27

of April 2026 and hence I can only vacate the premises Grocery Shop portion and my place of residence on 1^st May 2026. I hereby undertake to abide by this undertaking affidavit. “

¶28

The respondents have accepted the same.

¶29

Recording the same, the Writ Petition is disposed of. It is made clear

¶30

that until 01.05.2026, the third respondent shall not, in any manner, disturb the petitioner's possession and enjoyment of the property in question.

¶31

13.10.2025 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Rmk

¶32

¶33

1.The District Collector cum District Magistrate / Appellate Tribunal under the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007, Collectorate, Madurai - 625020.

¶34

¶35

_________Page 3 of 4

¶36

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶37

W.P.(MD) No.1935 of 2025

¶38

P.T.ASHA, J.

¶39

Rmk

¶40

W.P.(MD) No.1935 of 2025

¶41

13.10.2025

¶42

Page 4 of 4

¶43

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

G. Srinivasan v. The District Collector cum District Magistrate

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

G. Srinivasan v. The District Collector cum District Magistrate

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

L.Chelladurai, Vs the District Collector

A.Senthilvel and another Vs Dr.R.Selvaraj, Ias., and 3 others

Garuda Enterprises, Vs The Superintending Engineer(H)

G.Rajan, Vs the Secretary to Government

Balasubramanian M Vs The District Collector

V.Vijay Vs The Chief Engineer