Dismissed¶21

S.Ramesh v. the Corporation of

Madras HC19 Dec 2025WP(MD)/18935/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Madras High Court, Madurai Bench — W.P(MD) No.18935 of 2013 (& M.P.(MD)No.2 of 2013), S.Ramesh and others v. The Corporation of Tirunelveli — order dated 19.12.2025 authored by G.R.Swaminathan, J. (bench with R.Kalaimathi, J.) — challenge to Tirunelveli Corporation letter dated 31.10.2013 (lock-and-seal/demolition action, Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act) not decided on merits; dismissed as withdrawn on counsel's memo; no costs; connected miscellaneous petition closed; no ratio on planning-law merits; no cases cited.

What did the court decide?

None; writ petition dismissed as withdrawn with no costs; connected miscellaneous petition (M.P.(MD)No.2 of 2013) closed. ¶21

S.Ramesh Vs the Corporation of — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

W.P(MD) No.18935 of 2013

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

Date : 19.12.2025

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN AND THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE R.KALAIMATHI

¶6

W.P(MD) No.18935 of 2013 & M.P.(MD)No.2 of 2013

¶7

1.S.Ramesh

¶8

2.S.Murugesh

¶9

3.R.Seethalakshmi ... Petitioners

¶10

Vs.

¶11

The Corporation of Tirunelveli, Rep. by its Commissioner, Tirunelveli. ... Respondent

¶12

PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records of the respondent in Letter Reference No.139-2011T.P.4., dated 31.10.2013 relating to the petitioner's construction put up at T.S.No.400 part and 401 part, Ward No.4, Block No.2, bearing Door No. 1A, 2, 2C, North Mount Road on one side and Door No.1, North Car Street, Tirunelveli Town, Tirunelveli-6 on the other side issued by the 1/3

¶13

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶14

W.P(MD) No.18935 of 2013

¶15

respondent under the provisions of Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act, in contemplating action of locking and sealing / demolition to quash the same and consequently, forbear the respondent from initiating any coercive action of locking and sealing / demolition in the subject property referred above.

¶16

For Petitioners : Mr.M.P.Senthil

¶17

For Respondent : Mr.Aayiram K.Selvakumar

¶18

ORDER

¶19

(Order of the Court was made by G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J.)

¶20

The learned counsel for the petitioners has circulated a memo. He seeks withdraw of the writ petition.

¶21

2. In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.