The Manager v. The Honourable National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission
Constitution of India, Article 226 – Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus – Condonation of delay
Case brief
What is this about?
condonation of delay; law of limitation substantive; 254 days delay; NCDRC revision NC/R.P.No.718 of 2025 dated 27.05.2025; Sri Gokulam Chit & Finance Co (Pvt Ltd); Arsath Parvesh; National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission; writ of certiorarified mandamus; Article 226; consumer dispute; writ petition dismissed; no costs.
What did the court decide?
Uncondonable delay cannot be condoned as a matter of routine; the law of limitation is substantive and condonation of delay is an exception. Courts may take a lenient view only for meagre delay; where delay is long, the court must examine the reason and its genuineness, and if the reason is not convincing, the appellate forum may refuse to entertain the matter. ¶26