Disposed

P.Nagalingam v. The District Revenue Officer

Madras HC2 Jul 2025WP(MD)/17823/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought a mandamus directing the District Revenue Officer to enquire his pending 2024 representation for correction of a UDR Patta in his favour. The Court, without touching merits, disposed of the writ by directing final orders within twelve weeks after notice to interested parties.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondent to decide the 29.08.2024 UDR Patta correction representation on merits within 12 weeks with notice.

P.Nagalingam Vs The District Revenue Officer — Land Acquisition | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

W.P.(MD) No.17823 of 2025

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 02.07.2025

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.SOUNTHAR

¶6

W.P.(MD) No.17823 of 2025

¶7

P.Nagalingam ... Petitioner

¶8

Vs.

¶9

The District Revenue Officer, District Revenue Office, Sivaganga District. ... Respondents

¶10

Prayer :- Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondent to expeditiously enquire the appeal, made by the petitioner on 29.08.2024

¶11

for change the UDR Patta and issue patta in the petitioner's name which is pending before the respondent in e.fh.gp4/40198/2024 and pass order

¶12

within the time frame fixed by this Court.

¶13

For Petitioner : M/s.R.Bharathi

¶14

For Respondent : Mr.A.Baskaran Additional Government Pleader

¶15

Page 1 of 4

¶16

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶17

W.P.(MD) No.17823 of 2025

¶18

ORDER

¶19

The petitioner herein seeks a direction to the respondent to expeditiously enquire his representation dated 29.08.2024, seeking correction in the UDR Patta pertains to Survey No.24/12 in Kanjiram Village, Kalaiyarkovil Taluk, Sivagangai District.

¶20

2.Heard the arguments of M/s.R.Bharathi, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.A.Baskaran, learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondent. By consent of both sides, this Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself.

¶21

3.It is the case of the petitioner that he purchased two cents of land in the subject survey number from one Veeraiya under a registered sale deed dated 23.07.1987. During UDR updation, the names of Mariappan and Thakkappa, have been erroneously entered in the revenue records. Therefore, the petitioner submitted a representation on 29.08.2024 before the first respondent seeking correction of the UDR entry. The same has not been considered. Hence, the petitioner has come before this Court.

¶22

Page 2 of 4

¶23

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶24

W.P.(MD) No.17823 of 2025

¶25

4.The learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondent would submit that earlier the representation submitted by the petitioner was returned. Thereafter, the petitioner re-presented the same before the District Collector. Subsequently, the District Collector forwarded the representation to the respondent and the same is pending on file of the respondent.

¶26

In view of the same, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the matter, the respondent is directed to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 29.08.2024 and pass final orders on its own merits within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, after issuing notice to the petitioner, persons mentioned in the representation of the petitioner and other interested parties. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.

¶27

02.07.2025

¶28

NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No cp

¶29

_________ Page 3 of 4

¶30

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶31

W.P.(MD) No.17823 of 2025

S.SOUNTHAR,J

The District Revenue Officer, District Revenue Office, Sivaganga District.

¶36

W.P.(MD)No.17823 of 2025

¶37

Dated: 02.07.2025

¶38

_________ Page 4 of 4

¶39

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

P.Nagalingam v. The District Revenue Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

P.Nagalingam v. The District Revenue Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Muthu Lakshmi Vs The Competent Authority/

Nathugar Sulthan Vs Land Acquisition Officer and District Revenue Officer

Revathi Vs The Tahsildar

Yuvaraj Vs The Revenue Divisional Officer

Dhanalakshmi Vs The Tahsildar

Kalarani S Vs The District Collector