Mohamed Eakieem v. The Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner /
Case brief
What is this about?
EPF recovery order under Section 8F challenged via Article 226 certiorarified mandamus; petitioner contended recovery issued without order on pending Section 7B review application dated 19.11.2022; respondents' counsel submitted review dismissed 24.05.2023 and subsequent review dismissed 02.06.2023; writ petition closed with liberty to appeal before appellate tribunal; no costs; connected petition WMP.(MD)No.13828 of 2023 closed; Madurai Bench of Madras High Court; Justice B.Pugelendhi; petitioner Mohamed Eakieem; respondents: Assistant PF Commissioner/Recovery Officer Nagercoil, Enforcement Officer EPFO, Branch Manager Indian Bank Chenbagaramanputhur; decided 17.10.2025.
What did the court decide?
Writ petition closed with liberty to the petitioner to work out his remedy by preferring an appeal before the appellate tribunal; no costs; connected miscellaneous petition (WMP.(MD)No.13828 of 2023) also closed.