Dismissed¶24

R.M. Kannan v. The Commissioner

Madras HC16 Jun 2025WP(MD)/14445/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Dismissed as withdrawn; Article 226 certiorarified mandamus against E-Tender package proceedings (Packages 05, 11, 12, 13 / MGSMT 2025-26 dated 16.05.2025) of Additional Collector, DRDA Ramanathapuram; endorsement by counsel Mr.R.Murali; no costs; connected W.M.P(MD)Nos.10649, 10650, 11156 of 2025 closed; Madurai Bench, Madras High Court; Justice C. Saravanan; 16.06.2025.

What did the court decide?

No substantive relief; writ petition dismissed as withdrawn on counsel's endorsement, no costs, connected miscellaneous petitions closed. ¶24

R.M. Kannan Vs The Commissioner — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

W.P(MD)No.14445 of 2025

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 16.06.2025

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN

¶6

Writ Petition(MD)No.14445 of 2025 and

¶7

W.M.P(MD)Nos.10649 & 10650 of 2025 & W.M.P(MD)No.11156 of 2025

R.M.Kannan

..Petitioner

Vs.

1.The Commissioner,

¶12

Rural Development and Panchayat Raj Department, Panagal Building, Saidepat,

¶13

Chennai.

¶14

2.The Additional Collector, Development, District Rural Development Agency, Ramanathapuram.

¶15

... Respondents

¶16

Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records relating to the proceedings of the 2^nd respondent in respect of E-Tender Document Package No. 05/ MGSMT/2025-26 Package No. 11/ MGSMT/ 2025-26 Package No. 12/ MGSMT/2025-26 and Package No. 13/MGSMT/2025-26 dated 16.05.2025 and quash the same and consequently direct the Respondents to avoid package tender.

¶17

1/3

¶18

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶19

W.P(MD)No.14445 of 2025

¶20

For Petitioner : Mr.R.Murali For Respondents : Mr.J.K.Jayaseelan

¶21

Govt. Advocate

¶22

ORDER

¶23

Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave of this court to withdraw this writ petition. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.

¶24

In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

¶25

16.06.2025

¶26

NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet:Yes skn

¶27

To 1.The Commissioner, Rural Development and Panchayat Raj Department, Panagal Building, Saidepat, Chennai.

¶28

2.The Additional Collector, Development, District Rural Development Agency, Ramanathapuram.

¶29

2/3

¶30

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis