Dismissed¶22

S.Ganesan, v. the State of Tamil Nadu

Madras HC10 Mar 2025WP(MD)/13841/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Madras High Court, Madurai Bench; W.P.(MD)No.13841 of 2019; decided 10.03.2025; Justice M. Jothiraman; petitioner S. Ganesan; pension recovery order Na.Ka.No.458/E/2019 dated 21.05.2019 by Sub Treasury Officer, Srivilliputhur, Virudhunagar District; order recalled by issuing authority; letter dated 03.12.2024 stating no necessity to recover; writ petition dismissed as infructuous; no costs; connected miscellaneous petitions W.M.P(MD)Nos. 10359 and 21857 of 2019 closed; Article 226 of the Constitution of India; writ of Certiorarified Mandamus; State of Tamil Nadu, Finance Department.

What did the court decide?

In view of the Additional Government Pleader's submissions (that the 2nd respondent stated there is no necessity to recover the amount and that the impugned order was recalled), nothing survives for further adjudication in this case.

S.Ganesan, Vs the State of Tamil Nadu — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

W.P.(MD)No.13841 of 2019

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 10.03.2025

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.JOTHIRAMAN

¶6

W.P.(MD)No. 13841 of 2019 and

¶7

W.M.P(MD)No. 10359, 21857 of 2019

¶8

S. Ganesan ... Petitioner

¶9

Vs.

¶10

The State of Tamil Nadu, Represented by the Principal Secretary to Finance Department, The Secretariat, Fort Saint George, Chennai.

¶11

The Sub Treasury Officer, Sub Treasury Office, Srivilliputhur, Virudhunagar District.

¶12

... Respondents

¶13

PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling upon records of the 2^nd respondent relating to Na.Ka.No.458/E/2019 dated 21.05.2019 and quash the same and to consequently forbear the Respondents 1 and 2 from recovering any amount from the Petitioner's pension in future.

¶14

For Petitioner : Mr.P. Samuel Gunasingh For Respondents : Mr.G.V.Vairam Santhosh, Additional Government Pleader

¶15

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶16

1/4

¶17

W.P.(MD)No.13841 of 2019

¶18

ORDER

¶19

Today when the matter is taken up for hearing, the Learned

¶20

Additional Government Pleader appearing on behalf of the respondents, on written instructions would submit that the 2^nd respondent addressed a letter to him dated 03.12.2024, wherein it has been stated that there is no necessity to recover the amount from the writ petitioner. He further submitted that the order impugned in this writ petition was recalled by the 2^nd respondent herein i.e., Sub Treasury Officer, Srivilliputhur,

¶21