Siva Nedunchezian v. The District Collector
Case brief
What is this about?
Infructuous dismissal of writ petition; computerized patta upload; writ of mandamus; Article 226 of the Constitution of India; S.NO.2/2, Ward A.F Block No.1, Kottapattu Village, Trichy East Taluk, Trichy District; representation dated 9.5.2022; District Collector Trichy; Revenue Divisional Officer Trichy; Tahsildar Trichy East Taluk; Surveyor Trichy East Taluk; Mr.B.Jameel Arasu for petitioner; Mr.A.Baskaran, Addl.Govt.Pleader, for respondents 1 to 4; S.Sounthar J; Madurai Bench of Madras High Court; W.P(MD)No.12443 of 2022; decided 06.06.2025; dismissed as infructuous; no costs.
What did the court decide?
In view of the learned counsel for the petitioner submitting that the prayer sought for in the Writ Petition has become infructuous (with an endorsement to that effect in the Court bundle), the Court dismissed the Writ Petition as infructuous, with no costs. The substantive mandamus issue was not decided.