Disposed

P.S.V. Sea Foods Pvt. Limited v. the District Collector

Madras HC20 Jan 2025WP(MD)/11769/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petitions by a sea food manufacturing unit seeking mandamus to run its unit and to renew its consent order from the Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board. The Board stated the renewal application was not pending and production had stopped; police stated the unit was dismantled. The court closed the petitions as no adjudication was required.

What the court decided

AI extract

P.S.V. Sea Foods Pvt. Limited Vs the District… — Environment and Pollution | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

W.P.(MD)Nos.11769 of 2015 and 21660 of 2016

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 20.01.2025

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU

¶6

W.P.(MD)Nos.11769 of 2015 and 21660 of 2016 and M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2015

¶7

W.P.(MD)No.11769 of 2015:

¶8

P.S.V.Sea Foods Private Limited By its Managing Director, P.S.Velayudham

¶9

...Petitioner

¶10

¶11

1.The District Collector, Thoothukudi District, Thoothukudi.

¶12

2.The Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board, Thoothukudi, Represented by its, District Environmental Engineer, Thoothukudi.

¶13

3.The Superintendent of Police, Thoothukudi District, Thoothukudi.

¶14

4.The Inspector of Police, Kulasekaranpattinam Police Station, Kulasekaranpattinam, Thoothukudi District.

¶15

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶16

1/6

¶17

W.P.(MD)Nos.11769 of 2015 and 21660 of 2016

5.Rajamarthandan

6.Gunasekaran Velan

7.A.C.Sahul Hameed

8.G.T.Chandrasekaran

... Respondents

Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 4 to permit the petitioner Company to run the sea food manufacturing unit at S.No.161/1, Door No.1/88, Adhiyakurichy Village, Munupanai Road, Udankudi, Thiruchendur Taluk, Thoothukudi District, without any disturbance except under due process of law.

¶24

For Petitioner : Mr.H.Arumugam For R-1 : Mr.R.Suresh Kumar Additional Government Pleader For R-2 : M/s.Madhuri Donti Reddy For R-3 and R-4 : Ms.M.Aasha Government Advocate (Criminal Side) For R-5 to R-8 : Mr.V.Rajiv Rufus

¶25

W.P.(MD)No.21660 of 2016:

¶26

P.S.V.Sea Foods Private Limited By its Managing Director, P.S.Velayudham

¶27

...Petitioner

¶28

¶29

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶30

2/6

¶31

W.P.(MD)Nos.11769 of 2015 and 21660 of 2016

¶32

1.The Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board, Thoothukudi, Represented by its, District Environmental Engineer, Thoothukudi.

¶33

2.G.T.Chandrasekaran ... Respondents

¶34

(R-2 is impleaded vide Court Order dated 14.06.2023 in W.M.P.(MD) No.6000 of 2017 in W.P.(MD)No.21660 of 2016)

¶35

Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to consider the petitioner's application dated 30.09.2016 for renewal of consent order for running the Sea Food Manufacturing Unit at S.No.161/1, Door No.1/88, Adhiyakurichy Village, Munupanai Road, Udankudi, Thiruchendur Taluk, Thoothukudi District and to grant consent order to the petitioner within the time stipulated by this Court.

¶36

For Petitioner : Mr.H.Arumugam For R-1 : M/s.Madhuri Donti Reddy For R-2 : Mr.V.Rajiv Rufus

¶37

COMMON O R D E R

¶38

Heard the learned counsels on either side.

¶39

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶40

3/6

¶41

W.P.(MD)Nos.11769 of 2015 and 21660 of 2016

¶42

When the matters were taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board submitted that the petitioner's application dated 30.09.2016 is not pending on file, and further stated that the petitioner had stopped production. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondent Police, upon instructions, submitted that the petitioner's unit has been dismantled and the premises where the petitioner was functioning are now lying vacant.

¶43

In view of the statements made by the learned counsels

¶44

appearing for the Pollution Control Board as well as the respondent Police, no further adjudication is required to be made in these Writ Petitions.

¶45

Accordingly, the Writ Petitions stand closed. There shall be no

¶46

order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶47

20.01.2025

¶48

NCC:yes/no Index:yes/no Internet:yes/no https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Nsr

¶49

4/6

¶50

W.P.(MD)Nos.11769 of 2015 and 21660 of 2016

¶51

To:

¶52

1.The District Collector, Thoothukudi District, Thoothukudi.

¶53

2.The Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board, Thoothukudi, Represented by its, District Environmental Engineer, Thoothukudi.

¶54

3.The Superintendent of Police, Thoothukudi District, Thoothukudi.

¶55

4.The Inspector of Police, Kulasekaranpattinam Police Station, Kulasekaranpattinam, Thoothukudi District.

¶56

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶57

5/6

¶58

W.P.(MD)Nos.11769 of 2015 and 21660 of 2016

¶59

K.KUMARESH BABU, J.

¶60

Nsr

¶61

W.P.(MD)Nos.11769 of 2015 and 21660 of 2016

¶62

20.01.2025

¶63

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶64

6/6

P.S.V. Sea Foods Pvt. Limited v. the District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

P.S.V. Sea Foods Pvt. Limited v. the District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Tvl Remi Fasteners Vs The Assistant Commissioner

Tvl. Kaniyamparampil Steels Vs The Joint Commissioner of Sgst (Intelligence)

Anguthan Vs The District Collector

M. Arasamani Vs The Joint Commissioner

Muniyappan. C Vs The Assistant Commissioner

V.Krishnaveni Vs The Joint Commissioner