Disposed

Mayakrishnan Ganapathy v. The Regional Passport Officer

Madras HC24 Apr 2025WP(MD)/11725/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought quashing of the Passport Officer's refusal order, his application pending amid an FIR-level criminal case. Court held no impediment exists at FIR stage for issuing a passport, subject to the petitioner furnishing contact details, undertaking to accept summons by e-mail/WhatsApp and not stalling prosecution, and executing a special vakalat if needed.

What did the court decide?

Passport application to be processed on filing of undertaking affidavit before police; writ disposed on terms, no costs, connected MPs closed.

Mayakrishnan Ganapathy Vs The Regional Passport Officer — Quashing and FIR | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

W.P.(MD)No.11725 of 2025

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 24.04.2025

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE VIVEK KUMAR SINGH

¶6

W.P.(MD)No.11725 of 2025 and

¶7

W.M.P.(MD)Nos.8656 and 8657 of 2025

¶8

Mayakrishnan Ganapathy ... Petitioner

¶9

-vs-

¶10

1.The Regional Passport Officer, New Municipal Complex, Thillainagar 7^th Cross, Tiruchirappalli – 620 018.

¶11

2.The Inspector of Police, Keeranur Police Station, Pudukkottai District. ... Respondents

¶12

PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records pertaining to the impugned order of the first respondent vide his proceedings in Letter Ref.No.IMP/321208525/25 dated 21.03.2025 and quash the same as illegal.

¶13

For Petitioner : Mr.K.Arunraj For R1 : Mr.M.Gnanagurunathan Central Government Standing Counsel For R2 : Mr.K.Gnanasekaran Government Advocate (Criminal side)

¶14

_____________ Page 1 of 5_

¶15

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶16

W.P.(MD)No.11725 of 2025

¶17

ORDER

¶18

With the consent of the parties, the Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself.

¶19

2 . Heard both sides.

¶20

3 . The petitioner seeks to quash the order of the first respondent dated 21.03.2025. He has submitted an application before the jurisdictional passport officer. Apprehending that it may not be processed in view of his involvement in a criminal case, the present writ petition came to be filed.

¶21

4 . When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) appearing for the second respondent submitted that a case in Crime No.371 of 2022 for the offences under Sections 342, 294(b), 307, 450, 354 and 34 of I.P.C., registered against the petitioner, is pending at the F.I.R. stage.

¶22

5 . It is well settled that when the case is pending only at the F.I.R. stage, there is no impediment for the Regional Passport Officer to grant the relief sought for by the petitioner herein.

¶23

_____________ Page 2 of 5_

¶24

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶25

W.P.(MD)No.11725 of 2025

¶26

6 . The petitioner has to appear before the jurisdictional Police and file an affidavit indicating his contact details. The petitioner apart from furnishing his residential address must also give his WhatsApp mobile number, e-mail I.D. This is because, if any adverse final report is filed and the same is also taken on file by the jurisdictional criminal court, it should be possible to serve summons on the petitioner with the available details. The petitioner shall give an undertaking that the prosecution initiated against him will not be stalled on account of his absence from India. He should undertake that summons can be served on him through E- mail/WhatsApp. If necessary, the petitioner will have to execute a special Vakalat in future so that he can be represented by his counsel in the proceedings in terms of Section 205 of Cr.P.C.

¶27

7 . Upon the passport authority being satisfied that such an undertaking affidavit has been filed before the jurisdictional Police, the jurisdictional Regional Passport Officer shall process the petition mentioned application and issue passport subject to fulfilment of the other usual formalities.

¶28

_____________ Page 3 of 5_

¶29

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶30

W.P.(MD)No.11725 of 2025

¶31

8 . This Writ Petition is disposed of on the above terms. There shall be no

¶32

order as to costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.

¶33

NCC : Yes / No 24.04.2025 Index : Yes / No smn2

¶34

To:-

¶35

1.The Regional Passport Officer, New Municipal Complex, Thillainagar 7^th Cross, Tiruchirappalli – 620 018.

¶36

2.The Inspector of Police, Keeranur Police Station, Pudukkottai District.

¶37

_____________ Page 4 of 5_

¶38

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶39

W.P.(MD)No.11725 of 2025

¶40

VIVEK KUMAR SINGH, J.

¶41

smn2

¶42

W.P.(MD)No.11725 of 2025

¶43

24.04.2025

¶44

_____________ Page 5 of 5_

¶45

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Mayakrishnan Ganapathy v. The Regional Passport Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mayakrishnan Ganapathy v. The Regional Passport Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

A.Rajkumar Vs The Regional Passport Officer

R.M. Valliyammal Vs The Project Manager

Tvl. Ameen Lineman, Vs The Assistant Commissioner (St) (Fac)

Tvl a Sikkander Badhusha Vs State Tax Officer

M/s. a K Constructions Vs The Assistant Commissioner (St)

Nithya Vs The Secretary