Paulraj.T v. The District Registrar
Case brief
What is this about?
Impersonation in execution of registered document; mandamus under Article 226 to District Registrar Palayamkottai and Sub-Registrar Gangaikondan (Tirunelveli); representation dated 05.04.2022; enquiry restricted to impersonation only; parties to act 'as per law' depending on finding; eight-week completion deadline; writ petition disposed without costs; impleaders Kannan (R3, 21.06.2022) and Sukdev Munda (R4, 22.08.2024); Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, judge S. Srimathy, decided 17.06.2025.
What did the court decide?
The Court directed that the enquiry be confined to the alleged impersonation; if impersonation is found, the respondents may take action as per law, failing which the petitioner may act as per law, with the exercise to be completed within eight weeks of receipt of a copy of the order; writ petition disposed of without costs.