Pachaimuthu S.P.V Vs The Revenue Divisional Officer

PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to record the petitioners as cultivating tenants in the properties in S.No.16/3C to an extent of 0.36.5 acres, S.No.73/6 to an extent of 0.695 Acres, S.No.80/18 to an extent of 0.41.5 Acres of Punjai lands and the properties in S.No.171/1 to an extent of 0.5.50 Acres,

¶20

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶21

1/5

¶22

W.P(MD)No.1122 of 2023

¶23

S.No.171/2B to an extent of 0.7.00 Acres, S.No.171/3 to an extent of 0.37.50 Acres, S.No.168/2B and S.No.171/5 to an extent of 0.02.50 Acres of Nanjai land situated at Madagupatti Village, Sivagangai Taluk and District within the time stipulated by this Court.

¶24

For Petitioners : Mr.H.Mohamed Imran For RR 1 to 3 : Mr.M.Senthil Ayyanar Government Advocate For RR 4 to 6 : Mr.RM.Arunswaminathan

¶25

ORDER

¶26

This Writ Petition has been filed by the petitioners for a direction, directing the respondents to record the petitioners as cultivating tenants in the properties in S.No.16/3C to an extent of 0.36.5 acres, S.No.73/6 to an extent of 0.695 Acres, S.No.80/18 to an extent of 0.41.5 Acres of Punjai lands and the properties in S.No. 171/1 to an extent of 0.5.50 Acres, S.No.171/2B to an extent of 0.7.00 Acres, S.No.171/3 to an extent of 0.37.50 Acres, S.No. 168/2B and S.No.171/5 to an extent of 0.02.50 Acres of Nanjai land situated at Madagupatti Village, Sivagangai Taluk and District.

¶27

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶28

2/5

¶29

W.P(MD)No.1122 of 2023

¶30

2.Heard the learned counsel appearing on either side

¶31

and perused the materials placed before this Court.

¶32

3.Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the Writ Petition, the second respondent is directed to issue notice to the petitioners and the respondents 4 to 6 and conduct an enquiry and also affording an opportunity of hearing to them and pass orders, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶33

4.With the above direction, this Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected

¶34

Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

¶35

22.01.2025 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes ps

¶36

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶37

3/5

¶38

W.P(MD)No.1122 of 2023

¶39

To

¶40

1.The Revenue Divisional Officer, The Revenue Divisional Office, Sivagangai District.

¶41

2.The District Revenue Officer, The District Revenue Office, Sivagangai District.

¶42

3.The Tahsildar, O/o.The Tahsildar, Madurai South Taluk, Madurai – 20.

¶43

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶44

4/5

¶45

W.P(MD)No.1122 of 2023

¶46

G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.

¶47

ps

¶48

Order made in W.P(MD)No.1122 of 2023

¶49

22.01.2025

¶50

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶51

5/5

Pachaimuthu S.P.V v. The Revenue Divisional Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pachaimuthu S.P.V v. The Revenue Divisional Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The Executive Officer Vs The District Registrar

Pandiyammal .N Vs The District Collector

Kumari Selvan K Vs The Additional Chief Secretary to Government

Gnanapackiyam .a Vs the District Collector

Pavunsamy K Vs the District Collector

Jesuraj.a Vs The Assistant Director