Periyasamy v. The Thasildar
Case brief
What is this about?
Mandamus petition under Article 226 seeking deferment of revenue survey proceedings (Na.Ka.No. A7/138/2024 dated 13.12.2024) on paddy-cultivated land, Survey No. 280/1D, Kallai Village, Kulithalai Taluk, Karur District, extent 1 acre 4 cents, until paddy harvest completed; petitioner Periyasamy; respondents Thasildar, Kulithalai and Firka Surveyor, Thokamalai, Karur District; decided at admission stage by consent; survey directed after paddy harvest; petition disposed, no costs; connected W.M.P.(MD)No.709 of 2025 closed; judge L. Victoria Gowri; dated 20.01.2025.
What did the court decide?
Direction to the respondents to conduct survey of the subject property after the harvest of the paddy; no order as to costs; connected miscellaneous petition (W.M.P.(MD)No.709 of 2025) closed. ¶29