Writ petition seeking issuance of separate patta for land purchased by the petitioner. Pending the petition, the Tahsildar issued the patta, so nothing survived and the writ petition was closed with no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.(MD)No.10251 of 2024
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 18.02.2025
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE P.B. BALAJI
W.P.(MD)No.10251 of 2024
K.Thiruppathiraj
... Petitioner
Vs
4. A.Vijayan
... Respondents
PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for entire records pertaining to the impugned order dated 21.02.2024 issued by the 3rd respondent and quash the same and directing the 3rd respondent to issue the separate patta in favour of petitioner on their application No. 2023/0105/28/253652 dated 30.08.2023 with respect to the S.No.180/2 with an extent of 92 cents situate at Pandavarmangalam Village,
1/4
W.P.(MD)No.10251 of 2024
Kovilpatti Union, Tuticorin District as per registered Sale deed No. 8037/2023, dated 30.08.2023 within the period that may be stipulated by this Court.
For Petitioner : Mr.K.Sureshkumar For Respondents : Mr.C.Satheesh(R1-R3) Government Advocate
Mr.P.Selvam (R4)
ORDER
The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the writ petition has been filed only for issuance of a patta. However, pending the writ petition, the petitioner has been issued with patta.
2.Considering the fact that the respondent has already issued
patta to the petitioner, nothing survives for further consideration. This writ petition is closed. No costs.
18.02.2025 Index : Yes / No NCC : Yes / No PNM
2/4
W.P.(MD)No.10251 of 2024
TO:-
3/4
W.P.(MD)No.10251 of 2024
P.B. BALAJI, J.
PNM
ORDER IN W.P.(MD)No.10251 of 2024
18.02.2025
1 issue framed by the court
Should the impugned order refusing separate patta be quashed and patta issued for S.No.180/2?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
K.Thiruppathiraj
The District Collector, Tuticorin District
The Revenue Divisional Officer, Kovilpatti, Tuticorin District
The Tahsildar, Kovilpatti Taluk, Tuticcorin District
A.Vijayan
P.B. Balaji
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
