E. Malathi v. The State of Tamil Nadu
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ of mandamus under Article 226 to compel Vigilance and Anticorruption Department enquiry into complaint dated 05.07.2025 alleging bribe demand by police personnel (Thisayanvilai/Manoor Police Stations, Tirunelveli); writ petition dismissed as barred by alternate efficacious remedy under Section 175(3) of BNSS before the jurisdictional Court; liberty to invoke Section 175(3) BNSS; followed earlier order WP.Crl.(MD)No.1925 of 2025 (31.10.2025) relying on Priyanka Srivastava v. State of U.P., 2015(6) SCC 287; Prevention of Corruption Act; alternate remedy; Madurai Bench, Madras High Court; Justice N. Mala; decision date 16.12.2025.
What did the court decide?
If no action is taken on a complainant's complaint, the complainant is entitled to invoke Section 175(3) of BNSS before the jurisdictional Court to have the complaint registered; as such an alternate, efficacious remedy exists, the High Court is not inclined to entertain the mandamus writ petition.