Dismissed¶35

S.Rahmath Mariam v. The Superintendent of Police

Madras HC11 Sept 2025WP Crl.(MD)/1319/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Short single-judge disposal order: criminal writ petition (Article 226, writ of mandamus) by S. Rahmath Mariam alleging illegal gratification and forged patta issuance by erring officials (a Zonal Deputy Tahsildar and a Village Administrative Officer) at Ervadi Village, Keelakkarai Taluk, Ramanathapuram District, concerning patta land in Survey Nos. 546/1 and 547/1 (5 Acres 16 cents) and a representation dated 20.08.2025; dismissed as withdrawn on the counsel's endorsement, no costs, by Justice K. Murali Shankar on 11.09.2025. No substantive issue decided, no cases cited, no quantum involved; citable only for the practice of withdrawing a writ petition by endorsement at the hearing stage.

What did the court decide?

None; the writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn on the strength of the counsel's endorsement, with no costs. ¶35

S.Rahmath Mariam Vs The Superintendent of Police — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

W.P.Crl.(MD)No.1319 of 2025

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 11.09.2025

¶4

CORAM :

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.MURALI SHANKAR

¶6

W.P.Crl.(MD)No.1319 of 2025

S.Rahmath Mariam

...Petitioner

Vs.

1.The Superintendent of Police, O/o.The Superintendent of Police, Ramanathapuram District.

¶11

2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Vigilance and Anti-Corruption, Collectorate Campus, Ramanathapuram District.

¶12

3.The Inspector of Police, Vigilance and Anti-Corruption, Ramanathapuram District.

¶13

4.S.Palanikumar

¶14

The Zonal Deputy Tahsildar, Keelakarai Taluk, Ramanathapuram District.

¶15

5.R.Kalidass

¶16

The Village Administrative Officer, Ervadi Village,

¶17

Ramanathapuram District.

¶18

1/4

¶19

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶20

W.P.Crl.(MD)No.1319 of 2025

¶21

6.S.M.Ayshath Fatheema

¶22

7.S.M.A.Falila

¶23

8.S.M.A.Shakila

¶24

9.Sera Mudali Abubuckar Rahila

¶25

10.Zulaiha ... Respondents

¶26

PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent No.1 to 3 to conduct enquiry and take criminal action against the erring officials / Respondent No.4 and 5 under Vigilance and AntiCorruption Act for which they received illegal gratification and issued forged patta in favour of Respondent No.6 to 10 merely based on the unregistered documents and without consider the registered sale deeds of the petitioner's patta land in Survey No.546/1, 547/1 for an extent of 5 Acres 16 cents at Ervadi Village, Keelakkarai Taluk, Ramanathapuram District by considering the petitioner's representation dated 20.08.2025 within the time stipulated by this Court.

¶27

For Petitioner : Mr.I.Pinaygash

¶28

For Respondents : Mr.B.Thanga Aravindh, Government Advocate (Crl. Side)

¶29

ORDER

¶30

When the matter is taken up for hearing today, the learned counsel

¶31

appearing for the writ petitioner seeks permission of this Court to 2/4

¶32

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis