Disposed

Karan Bose v. The State of Tamilnadu through Secretary

Madras HC12 Sept 2025WP Crl./634/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner alleged abduction, confinement, extortion and assault by private respondents aided by police over a commercial dispute, and sought investigation with CCTV seizure plus directions to the MSME Facilitation Council. The court directed the Assistant Commissioner of Police, Coimbatore to investigate and seize CCTV footage of 18.06.2025, monitored by the Superintendent of Police, and closed t

What did the court decide?

Investigation directed: ACP Coimbatore to probe and seize CCTV footage of 18.06.2025, monitored by SP Coimbatore; petition closed, no costs.

Karan Bose Vs The State of Tamilnadu through Secretary — Quashing and FIR | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

W.P.(Crl.) No.634 of 2025

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 12.09.2025

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR

¶6

W.P.(Crl.) No.634 of 2025 and

¶7

WP.MP.No.292 of 2025

Karan Bose

... Petitioner

Vs.

1.State of Tamil Nadu through Secretary Home, Secretariat, Fort St. George, Chennai-600 009.

¶12

2.Karan Jashrapuria

¶13

3.Sukumar

¶14

4.The Sub Inspector

¶15

presently posted at Police Station Palladum Tirupur District, Tamil Nadu – 641 664.

¶16

5.S.H.O. Palladum Police Station, Trichy Road, Palladum, Tirupur-641 664.

¶17

6.MSME Facilitation Council Coimbatore Through its Chairman-Presiding Officer, No.2, Raja Street, Coimbatore-641 001, Tamil Nadu.

¶18

7.Vijay Krishna Pandey

¶19

Page 1 of 7

¶20

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶21

W.P.(Crl.) No.634 of 2025

¶22

8.M/s.Taurus Collection Mumbai

¶23

Through Bhushan Kamath, Shash Industrial Estate, Veera Desai Road, Near Supreme Chambers, Andheri West, Mumbai 400 053.

¶24

9.Hotel Manager, Zone Connect by the Park Coimbatore, 39, Kalapatti Main Road, Indira Nagar, Civil Aerodrome Post, Nehur Nagar West, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu-641 014.

¶25

... Respondents

¶26

Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Coimbatore or any competent authority to investigate the matter of digital surveillance leading to abduction, extortion, assault and attempt to kill the petitioner on 18.06.2025 from Hotel Zone Connect by the Park Inn Coimbatore located in Peelamedu Police Station by taking into account the CCTV Footage of the hotel premises of respondent No.9 and premises of Police Station Palladum/R5 against respondent No.2 to 5 and respondent No.7 and 8. Additionally, in the interest of equity in a parallel matter it is prayed to issue a writ in nature of mandamus to respondent No.6 to examine maintainability of reference made by respondent no.2 dated 27.02.2025 and expedite disposal of reference in commercial dispute in connected matter or in the alternative refer the commercial dispute for mediation before the Madras High Court, Principal Bench.

¶27

For Petitioner : Mr.Karan Bose Party-in-Person For Respondent : Mr.K.M.D.Muhilan, APP Nos.1, 4 & 5

¶28

Page 2 of 7

¶29

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶30

W.P.(Crl.) No.634 of 2025

¶31

O R D E R

¶32

The present Writ Petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking a direction to the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Coimbatore or any competent authority to investigate the matter of digital surveillance leading to abduction, extortion, assault and attempt to kill the petitioner on 18.06.2025 from Hotel Zone Connect by the Park Inn Coimbatore located in the jurisdiction of Peelamedu Police Station by taking into account the CCTV Footage of the hotel premises of respondent No.9 and premises of Police Station Palladum/R5 against respondent No.2 to 5 and respondent No.7 and 8. Additionally, in the interest of equity in a parallel matter it is prayed to issue a writ in nature of mandamus to respondent No.6 to examine maintainability of reference made by respondent no.2 dated 27.02.2025 and expedite disposal of reference in commercial dispute in connected matter or in the alternative refer the commercial dispute for mediation before the Madras High Court, Principal Bench.

¶33

2. Heard the petitioner/Party-in-Person as well as the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the respondents 1, 4 & 5.

¶34

Page 3 of 7

¶35

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶36

W.P.(Crl.) No.634 of 2025

¶37

3. The petitioner, who is a party-in-person submitted that, due to

¶38

commercial transaction between the petitioner and the second respondent, the petitioner was completely put to watch by the henchmen along with the police officials to know his presence. The petitioner's whereabouts has been trapped when he was staying in Hotel Zone Connect between 17.06.2025 and 19.06.2025. On 18.09.2025, the second respondent with his henchmen with the assistance of the police caught him and kept him in confinement and demanded money. He was abducted to the forest area and was beaten and they also demanded a sum of Rs.20 lakhs. He was kept in confinement for nine hours under threat and coercion. The petitioner has also lodged a complaint in this regard and also made representations to the respondent police but no action was taken. Hence, the present Petition.

¶39

4. Per contra, it is the contentions of the learned Additional Public Prosecutor that the complaint given by the petitioner which is pending in CSR stage, has now been closed. However, the closure date was not mentioned in the CSR copy.

¶40

5. Be that as it may, it is the case of petitioner that he was abducted, threatened, beaten and demanded money by the second respondent, for

¶41

Page 4 of 7

¶42

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶43

W.P.(Crl.) No.634 of 2025

¶44

proving the same, he requests to seize the CCTV footages of the places on 18.06.2025, where the incident took place such as the Hotel Zone Connect, Palladam Police Station and nearby areas.

¶45

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court directs the Assistant Commissioner of Police, Coimbatore to investigate the case and seize the CCTV footages of the nexus premises on 18.06.2025 and to file a report and pursuant to the investigation, if any cognizable offence is made out, the respondent police shall proceed as per law. Further, the said investigation has to be monitored by the Superintendent of Police, Coimbatore.

¶46

7. With the above observations and directions, the Writ Petition stands

¶47

closed. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is also closed, if any. There shall be no orders as to costs.

¶48

12.09.2025

¶49

Index:Yes/No NCC :Yes/No

¶50

¶51

Page 5 of 7

¶52

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶53

W.P.(Crl.) No.634 of 2025

¶54

¶55

1.The Home Secretary, State of Tamil Nadu, Secretariat, Fort St. George, Chennai-600 009.

¶56

2.The Sub Inspector presently posted at Palladum Police Station, Tirupur District, Tamil Nadu – 641 664.

¶57

3.S.H.O. Palladum Police Station, Trichy Road, Palladum, Tirupur-641 664.

¶58

4.The Public Prosecutor, Madras High Court.

¶59

Page 6 of 7

¶60

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶61

W.P.(Crl.) No.634 of 2025

¶62

N.SATHISH KUMAR.J,

¶63

¶64

W.P.(Crl.) No.634 of 2025 and WP.MP.No.292 of 2025

¶65

12.09.2025

¶66

Page 7 of 7

¶67

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Karan Bose v. The State of Tamilnadu through Secretary

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Karan Bose v. The State of Tamilnadu through Secretary

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Guechi Justine Vs The State Rep by, The Inspector of Police

Jurassic Refiners and Jewels Private Limited Vs the Assistant Commissioner of Customs

M/s Kalindi Gold rep by its Partner Vs The Inspector of Police

V.V.R.S. Prabhu Vs Vikesh

V.Raghunathan Vs State Represented by Its

R.Prithiviraja Vs The State Rep by the , Inspector of Police