Dismissed¶27

Radha v. The State Rep by its, The Deputy Inspector General of Prisons

Madras HC21 Jul 2025WP Crl./354/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Madras High Court criminal writ petition dismissed as withdrawn on the basis of counsel's submission and endorsement; petition sought mandamus under Article 226 for 20 days' emergency leave without escort for convict son (Convict No.1067) lodged in Central Prison, Salem; no ruling on merits, no cases cited, non-speaking order dated 21.07.2025.

What the court decided

AI extract

Radha Vs The State Rep by its, The Deputy Inspector… — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

W.P.Crl.No.354 of 2025

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 21.07.2025

¶4

CORAM :

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.S. RAMESH

¶6

AND

¶7

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN

¶8

W.P.Crl.No.354 of 2025

Radha

... Petitioner

Vs.

1.The State Rep by its, Deputy Inspector General of Prisons, Egmore, Chennai-600 008

¶13

2.The Superintendent of Central Prison Central Prison,

¶14

Salem, Salem District.

¶15

... Respondents

¶16

Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus, to direct the second respondent to grant emergency leave for 20 days, without escort to the petitioner's son Muthu, son of Raja, Convict No.1067, confined at Central Prison, Salem to secure the ends of justice.

¶17

Page 1 of 4

¶18

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶19

W.P.Crl.No.354 of 2025

¶20

For Petitioner : Ms.D.Gnanasoundari For Respondents : Mr.E.Raj Thilak Additional Public Prosecutor

¶21

ORDER

¶22

M.S.RAMESH, J. and

¶23

V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN, J.

¶24

The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court

¶25

to withdraw this petition and she has also made an endorsement to that effect in the Court bundle.

¶26

2. In view of the submission and endorsement made by the learned

¶27

counsel for the petitioner, this Criminal Writ Petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.

¶28

[M.S.R., J] [V.L.N., J] 21.07.2025

¶29

Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No Anu

¶30

Page 2 of 4

¶31

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶32

W.P.Crl.No.354 of 2025

¶33

¶34

1.The State Rep by its, Deputy Inspector General of Prisons, Egmore, Chennai-600 008 2.The Superintendent of Central Prison Central Prison, Salem, Salem District. 3.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

¶35

M.S.RAMESH, J.

¶36

Page 3 of 4

¶37

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶38

W.P.Crl.No.354 of 2025

¶39

and V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN, J.

¶40

Anu

¶41

W.P.Crl.No.354 of 2025

¶42

21.07.2025

¶43

Page 4 of 4

¶44

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Radha v. The State Rep by its, The Deputy Inspector General of Prisons

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Radha v. The State Rep by its, The Deputy Inspector General of Prisons

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Masilamani Vs The State of Tamil Nadu, rep.by its

R.Chitra Vs State rep by, The Secretary to the Government

Maheswari Vs State rep by the Secretary to the Government

Senthilvadivu Vs the Director

S.Porchezhiyan, Vs the Bar Council of Tamil Nadu and Puducherry

Varathan Vs The Superintendent of Police