Disposed

Ramaniyam Real Estates Pvt. Ltd., v. The Additional Commissioner of Police

Madras HC11 Aug 2025WP Crl./211/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought a mandamus to expedite investigation of its complaint alleging fabrication of sale documents. FIR under cheating and forgery provisions was already registered but investigation stalled. The Court directed respondents 1 and 2 to complete investigation and file a final report within four months.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondents 1 and 2 to complete investigation in Crime No.41 of 2023 and file final report within four months; no costs.

Ramaniyam Real Estates Pvt. Ltd., Vs The Additional… — Quashing and FIR | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

W.P.(Crl.) No.211 of 2025

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 11.08.2025

¶4

CORAM :

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMAR

¶6

W.P.(Crl.)No.211 of 2025

¶7

M/s.Ramaniyam Real Estates Pvt. Ltd., Represented by its Managing Director, Mr.V.Jaggannathan, 14/67, 3^rd Main Road, Gandhi Nagar, Adyar, Chennai – 600 020.

¶8

... Petitioner

¶9

Vs.

¶10

1.Additional Commissioner of Police, Central Crime Branch, Prevention of Land Grabbing Section, Vepery, Chennai – 600 007.

¶11

2.Assistant Commissioner of Police (Team II) Central Crime Branch, (Prevention of Land Grabbing Section) Office of Additional Commissioner of Police, Vepery, Chennai -600 007.

¶12

3.Arun Malhotra

¶13

4.M/s.Satya Surendra Developers, A partnership firm represented by its Partner Mr.Arun Malhotra, No.240, Zone-1, M.P.Nagar, Bhopal – 462 011 Madhya Pradesh. ... Respondents

¶14

Page 1 of 5

¶15

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶16

W.P.(Crl.) No.211 of 2025

¶17

Prayer :

¶18

Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent Police to expedite the investigation and file a final report of this case based on the petitioner's complaint dated 15.09.2022 expeditiously.

¶19

For Petitioner : Mr.V.Karthik for Mr.S.Sundaresan For R1 and R2 : Mr.R.Vinothraja Government Advocate (Crl. Side) For R3 and R4 : Mr.Prahalad K. Bhatt

¶20

O R D E R

¶21

This writ petition has been filed for a direction to the respondent Police to complete the investigation and file a final report based on the petitioner's complaint dated 15.09.2022.

¶22

2.The petitioner has filed a complaint dated 15.09.2022 against the 3^rd

¶23

respondent alleging that he is attempting to alienate the property by registering a sale deed in his favour using fabricated documents. The petitioner also exposed the same before the Sub-Registrar's Office and based on the petitioner's complaint, the Sub-Registrar lodged the complaint before

¶24

Page 2 of 5

¶25

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶26

W.P.(Crl.) No.211 of 2025

¶27

the respondent Police on 15.09.2022. The complaint has been forwarded by the Sub-Registrar on the ground that he suspected that the 3^rd respondent has presented false documents before him for registration. Based on the complaint given by the Sub-Registrar, Saidapet South Chennai, an FIR has been registered in Crime No.41 of 2023 for the alleged offences under Sections 420, 465, 467, 468, 471 and 511 IPC.

¶28

3.Now, it is the grievance of the petitioner that, despite registration of FIR, nothing is moving further and investigation has not been completed. Whereas, according to the learned counsel appearing for the respondents 3 and 4, the matter is only civil in nature.

¶29

4.Be that as it may. Having registered an FIR, it is for the Investigation Officer to investigate the matter as per law and if he finds that any offence is made out as per the materials collected by him, he has to file a final report and if he finds that no case is made out for prosecution, he has to submit a closure report before the Court. Therefore, the respondents 1 and 2 are directed to complete the investigation in Crime No.41 of 2023 and file a final report either positively or negatively within a period of four

¶30

Page 3 of 5

¶31

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶32

W.P.(Crl.) No.211 of 2025

¶33

months from the date of this order.

¶34

5.With the above direction, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs.

¶35

11.08.2025

¶36

mkn

¶37

Internet : Yes Index : Yes / No Speaking order : Yes / No Neutral Citation : Yes / No

¶38

¶39

1.The Additional Commissioner of Police, Central Crime Branch, Prevention of Land Grabbing Section, Vepery, Chennai – 600 007.

¶40

2.The Assistant Commissioner of Police (Team II) Central Crime Branch, (Prevention of Land Grabbing Section) Office of Additional Commissioner of Police, Vepery, Chennai -600 007.

¶41

3.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

¶42

Page 4 of 5

¶43

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶44

W.P.(Crl.) No.211 of 2025

¶45

N. SATHISH KUMAR, J.

¶46

mkn

¶47

W.P.(Crl.)No.211 of 2025

¶48

11.08.2025

¶49

Page 5 of 5

¶50

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Ramaniyam Real Estates Pvt. Ltd., v. The Additional Commissioner of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ramaniyam Real Estates Pvt. Ltd., v. The Additional Commissioner of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

J.Santhosh Vs M.Nirmal Kumar

The Secretary Vs R. Pechimuthu

K.C.Balaji Vs B. Rehana Begum

N.Revathi Muthulakshmi Vs P.Nagaraj

I.P.Yesudoss Vs the State Represented by

Dr.D.Jayakumar Vs The Superintendent of Police