K.Balasubramanian v. the State of Tamil Nadu
Case brief
What is this about?
SIPCOT Industrial Park; land acquisition; Namakkal; Mohanur Taluk; Valayapatti and Pudhupatti villages; protection of water bodies; lakes Thaimaan, Govindapillai, Kinathadipallam, Karaipotaan Aaru (Cauvery tributary) and Valayapatti; Survey Nos. 128, 314, 186, 691; dry lands 195.27.15 Hectares (482.51 acres); grazing grounds 27.93.50 Hectares; poromboke; writ of Mandamus; Article 226; maintainability of association petition; Vivasaya Munnetra Kazhagam; disposed with no costs; Krishnan Ramasamy J.; WMP No. 10738 of 2025.
What did the court decide?
Taking note of the 3rd respondent's detailed counter that the proposed acquisition comprised only Ryotwari dry lands measuring 195.27.15 Hectares (482.51 acres) with no wet land, temple land or water bodies, and that alternate Government poromboke lands would be worked out for the grazing grounds (27.93.50 Hectares), the Court held that no indulgence needed to be provided to the petitioner.