Dismissed

M/s.v.Sinraju Constructions v. Tender Inviting Authority Cum

Madras HC3 Jan 2025WP/9051/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Bombay High Court dismissed multiple writ petitions filed against a tender rejection order as infructuous, noting the petitioner's counsel had endorsed the petitions as no longer maintainable, thereby closing connected miscellaneous petitions.

What did the court decide?

Petitions dismissed as infructuous; connected writ miscellaneous petitions closed. No costs awarded.

M/s.v.Sinraju Constructions Vs Tender Inviting… — Public Procurement and Tenders | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 03.01.2025

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN

¶6

W.P Nos. 9051, 9052, 9053, 9054, 9055, 9056 & 9057 of 2017

¶7

and

¶8

W.M.P Nos. 9967, 9968, 9969, 9970, 9971, 9972, 9973, 9974, 9975, 9976, 9977, 9978, 9979 & 9980 of 2024

¶9

and

¶10

W.M.P.Nos.29898, 29899, 29900, 29901, 29902, 29903 & 29904 of 2017

¶11

W.P.No.9051 of 2017:

¶12

M/s.V.Sinraju Constructions,

¶13

No.23/136, 6^th Ward, Keeripatti Post, Attur Taluk, Salem District,

¶14

Rep. by its Managing Partner V.Sinraju .. Petitioner

¶15

Vs.

¶16

1.Tender Inviting Authority -cum- Project Director, District Rural Development Agency, Rural Development and Panchayat Raj Department, Collector Office Campus, Salem.

¶17

2.The Tender Evaluation Committee,

¶18

Rep. by its Committee Member -cum- Project Director, District Rural Development Agency,

¶19

Rural Development and Panchayat Raj Department, Collector Office Campus, Salem.

¶20

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶21

¶22

3.M/s.National Informatics Centre,

¶23

Having Office at 3^rd Avenue, Tiruvallur Nagar, Besant Nagar, Chennai – 600 090. Rep. by the State Informatics Officer.

¶24

4.M/s.Annamalai & Co.,

¶25

Rep. by its Managing Director Mr.Karthic, S/o.Annamalai, No.10/57, Pachaliyur, Chinnappanpatti Po., Kedapali Taluk, Salem District. ... Respondents

¶26

R3 is suo motu impleaded as per order dated 27.04.2017 by MMSJ in W.P.Nos.9051 to 9057 of 2017.

¶27

R4 impleaded as per order dated 06.06.2017 by MMSJ in WMP.Nos.12387 to 12390 in W.P.Nos.9051 to 9054 of 2017.

¶28

R4 impleaded as per order dated 20.11.2017 by SVNJ in WMP.No.31344 of 2017 in W.P.No.9055 of 2017.

¶29

R4 impleaded as per order dated 20.11.2017 by SVNJ in WMP.No.31345 of 2017 in W.P.No.9056 of 2017.

¶30

R4 impleaded as per order dated 20.11.2017 by SVNJ in WMP.No.31345 of 2017 in W.P.No.9057 of 2017.

¶31

Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India

¶32

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶33

¶34

praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to the order of rejection dated 07.04.2017 for the tender for the work viz., Tender ID : 2017_RDTN_70195_1 in Tender Reference No.ROC No.2150/16/A5 on the file of the 1^st respondent and to quash the same and direct the respondents to restore the bid of the petitioner and process the same in accordance with law.

¶35

For Petitioners .. Mr.V.Elangovan, in all WPs. For R1 & R2 .. Mr.T.Chandrasekaran, Special Government Pleader, in all WPs. For R3 .. Mr.V.P.Sengottuvel, SCGSC, in all WPs For R4 .. Mr.S.Dhassaiya, in all WPs.

¶36

COMMON ORDER

¶37

Today, when the matters are taken up for hearing, it is submitted by

¶38

the learned counsel for the petitioner that nothing further survives for adjudication in these Writ Petitions and the issues raised have become infructuous and he has also made an endorsement to that effect in the Court bundles.

¶39

In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the

¶40

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶41

¶42

petitioner, these Writ Petitions are dismissed as infructuous. No costs.

¶43

Consequently, connected Writ Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.

¶44

03.01.2025

¶45

Index:Yes/No Internet:Yes/No smv

¶46

¶47

1.Tender Inviting Authority -cum- Project Director, District Rural Development Agency, Rural Development and Panchayat Raj Department, Collector Office Campus, Salem.

¶48

2.Committee Member -cum- Project Director, The Tender Evaluation Committee, District Rural Development Agency, Rural Development and Panchayat Raj Department, Collector Office Campus, Salem.

¶49

3.The State Informatics Officer Office at 3^rd Avenue, Tiruvallur Nagar, Besant Nagar, Chennai – 600 090.

¶50

C.V.KARTHIKEYAN,J.

¶51

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶52

¶53

smv

¶54

W.P Nos. 9051, 9052, 9053, 9054, 9055, 9056 & 9057 of 2017

¶55

03.01.2025

¶56

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

M/s.v.Sinraju Constructions v. Tender Inviting Authority Cum

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/s.v.Sinraju Constructions v. Tender Inviting Authority Cum

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sekar Vs the Commissioner of Chennai Corporation

Gubhappriya Jayaraman Vs the District Collector Cum Appellate Tribunal

K.Gous Basha Vs the Director

K.Ganesan, Vs Rajesh Lakhoni, I.a.S., and another

J.Sadhananda Sundaraj Vs Executive Officer

R.Govindasamy, Vs The Executive Officer