Dismissed¶27

Santhi v. the State Represented by Its

Madras HC8 Apr 2025WP/8217/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Madras High Court writ petition (Article 226) by Santhi challenging order dated 12.02.2025 of Superintendent, Puzhal Central Prison-I, seeking 20 days emergency leave without escort for convict Saravanan (Convict No.8338); dismissed as withdrawn on 08.04.2025 with liberty to file fresh petition; no costs; W.M.P.No.9208 of 2025 closed; Bench: M.S. Ramesh and N.Senthilkumar, JJ.; counsel: S.Sadhana (petitioner), R.Muniyapparaj APP assisted by M.Sylvester John (respondents).

What did the court decide?

Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh petition; no costs; connected miscellaneous petition closed. ¶27

Santhi Vs the State Represented by Its — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

W.P.No.8217 of 2025

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 08.04.2025

¶4

CORAM :

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.S. RAMESH

¶6

and

¶7

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.SENTHILKUMAR

¶8

W.P.No.8217 of 2025

¶9

and W.M.P.No.9208 of 2025

Santhi

... Petitioner

Vs.

1.The State represented by its The Deputy Inspector General of Prison Gandhi Irwin Road, Egmore Chennai 600 008

¶14

2.The Superintendent Puzhal Central Prison - I Chennai 600 066 ... Respondents

¶15

Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records connected with impugned order in proceedings No.714646 / Thaku2/2025, dated 12.02.2025 passed by the second respondent and quash the same and directing the respondents to grant emergency leave

¶16

Page 1 of 4

¶17

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶18

W.P.No.8217 of 2025

¶19

for 20 days without escort to the detenu, Saravanan, S/o.Loganathan, aged about 43 years bearing Convict No.8338, confined at Central Prison - I, Puzhal.

¶20

F or Petitioner : Ms.S.Sadhana

¶21

For Respondents : Mr.R.Muniyapparaj Additional Public Prosecutor assisted by Mr.M.Sylvester John

ORDER

M.S.RAMESH, J. AND

N.SENTHILKUMAR, J.

The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition. He has also made an endorsement to that effect in the Court bundle.

¶26

In view of the submission and endorsement made by the learned

¶27

counsel for the petitioner, this Writ Petition stands dismissed as withdrawn, granting liberty to file a fresh petition. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶28

kas

¶29

Page 2 of 4

¶30

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶31

W.P.No.8217 of 2025

¶32

To.

¶33