Disposed¶32

Tr.D.Dhanavel v. The Additional Chief Secretary to Government

Madras HC8 Jan 2025WP/8029/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Revocation of suspension; prayer infructuous; retirement from service; vigilance case pending; writ of certiorari; Article 226 Constitution of India; G.O.(2D) No.361 dated 18/12/2019; G.O.(2D) No.374 dated 31/12/2019; Additional Chief Secretary to Government Home (Police -2) Department; Directorate of Vigilance & Anticorruption; Director General of Police; Additional Government Pleader R.U.Dinesh Rajkumar; counsel Thenmozhi Shivaperumal; petitioner D.Dhanavel; High Court of Judicature at Madras; Writ Petition No.8029 of 2022; Justice Vivek Kumar Singh; decided 8/1/2025; no costs.

What did the court decide?

Since the petitioner has been retired from service, the prayer to revoke the suspension has become infructuous; no costs. ¶32

Tr.D.Dhanavel Vs The Additional Chief Secretary to… — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

Writ Petition No.8029 of 2022

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

Dated: 8/1/2025

¶4

C O R A M

¶5

THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE VIVEK KUMAR SINGH

¶6

Writ Petition No.8029 of 2022

D.Dhanavel

... Petitioner

The Additional Chief Secretary to Government Home (Police -2) Department Fort St. George Chennai 600 009.

¶11

The Director Directorate of Vigilance & Anticorruption No.293 MKN Road, Alandur Chennai 600 116.

¶12

The Director General of Police

¶13

1 Kamaraja Salai, Mylapore Chennai 600 004.

¶14

Respondents

¶15

PRAYER : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India

¶16

praying for the issuance of a writ of certiorari to call for the records on the file of the first respondent dated 18/12/2019 in G.O.(2D) No.361 and in G.O.(2D) No.374 dated 31/12/2019 and quash the same.

¶17

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶18

Page No:1/4

¶19

Writ Petition No.8029 of 2022

¶20

For petitioner ... Ms.Thenmozhi Shivaperumal For respondents ... Mr.R.U.Dinesh Rajkumar Additional Government Pleader

¶21

¶22

O R D E R

¶23

This writ petition has been filed to quash the orders dated 18/12/2019

¶24

and 31/12/2019 passed by the first respondent in G.O.(2D) No.361 and in G.O.(2D) No.374 respectively.

¶25

Heard Ms.Thenmozhi Shivaperumal, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.R.U.Dinesh Rajkumar, Additional Government Pleader for the respondents.

¶26

The learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents submitted that petitioner has been retired from service. Moreover, vigilance case is pending against the petitioner. Before the outcome of the same, no order can be passed.

¶27

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶28

Page No:2/4

¶29

Writ Petition No.8029 of 2022

¶30