Disposed¶39

Shameem v. Union Bank of India

Madras HC19 Feb 2025WP/774/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition Article 226 certiorarified mandamus Recovery Officer DRT-II Chennai sale notice 10.12.2024 TRC No.674/2022 DRC No.314/2019 O.A.No.243/2007 Union Bank of India UCO Bank Bank of Baroda settlement redemption proposal joint compromise memo 19.02.2025 disposed in terms of compromise no costs interim applications closed Madras High Court Chief Justice K.R. Shriram Mohammed Shaffiq.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition disposed of in terms of the joint compromise memo dated 19.02.2025 entered into between the petitioner and respondents 1 to 3; no order as to costs; interim applications closed. ¶39

Shameem Vs Union Bank of India — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

W.P.No.774 of 2025

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 19.02.2025

¶4

CORAM :

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR.K.R.SHRIRAM, CHIEF JUSTICE

¶6

AND

¶7

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ

¶8

W.P.No.774 of 2025 and W.M.P.Nos.943 and 944 of 2025

Shameem

.. Petitioner

1.Union Bank of India, Stressed Assets Management Branch, No.38 & 39, Whites Road, Royapettah, Chennai-600 014.

¶13

2.UCO Bank, Chennai Main Branch, No.169, Thambuchetty Street, Chennai-600 001.

¶14

3.Bank of Baroda, George Town Branch, No.340, Mint Street, Chennai-600 079.

¶15

.. Respondents

¶16

___________ Page 1 of 7_

¶17

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶18

W.P.No.774 of 2025

¶19

Prayer : Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ of certiorarified mandamus calling for the records on the file of the Recovery Officer, DRT-II, Chennai relating to the sale notice dated 10.12.2024 in TRC No.674/2022 (DRC No.314/2019 DRT : II, Chennai) in O.A.No.243/2007 ad the letter of the respondents 1 to 3 dated 3.10.2024 and quash the same and consequently direct the respondents 1 to 3 to accept the proposal submitted by the petitioner for settlement/redemption.

¶20

For Petitioner : Mr.T.Saikrishnan

¶21

For Respondents : Ms.M.Geethapriya for respondent Nos.1 to 3

¶22

ORDER

¶23

(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice)

¶24

Parties have entered into a compromise memo dated 19^th February,

¶25

The compromise memo signed by petitioner and the authorised representative of first respondent, for itself and as representative for respondent Nos.2 and 3 and their respective advocates, is taken on record and marked as “X” for identification. The signatories are identified by the respective advocates. For ease of reference, the joint compromise memo is

¶26

___________ Page 2 of 7_

¶27

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶28

W.P.No.774 of 2025

¶29

scanned and re-produced below:

¶30

___________ Page 3 of 7_

¶31

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis