R.Panneerselvam, v. the State, Rep by Secretary to
Case brief
What is this about?
Madras High Court writ petitions dismissed for petitioner's non-appearance; challenge to Sec 1(2)(b) TNVAT (5th Amendment) Act 2013 and TASMAC/IMFS demand letter Pdl FL2/FL3/2013 dt.13.12.2013 left unadjudicated as issue covered by first Bench decision in M. Ravichandran (W.P.No 34099 of 2013 batch, dt. 29.04.2015), where retrospective demand was waived by Government Notification dt. 21.04.2015.
What did the court decide?
In light of the issue standing covered by the first Bench decision in M. Ravichandran, the writ petitions were dismissed, with no costs, and the connected miscellaneous petitions were closed. ¶36