Dismissed¶29

Srinivas Waste Management v. Commissioner

Madras HC2 Jul 2025WP/6576/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

WP No. 6576 of 2025, Madras High Court, N. Mala J., 02-07-2025; Srinivas Waste Management v. Commissioner, Salem Municipal Corporation; Article 226 writ of mandamus; release of outstanding payment Rs. 3,95,34,342 for municipal waste collection, segregation and transportation (July 2014 - January 2019); pursuant to representations and Tamil Nadu Urban Local Bodies Ombudsman Order No. 1116/Ma/2023 dated 22.05.2023; amicable settlement outside Court; withdrawal endorsement; letter dated 27.06.2025 to Registry; dismissed as withdrawn; no costs; no substantive ruling; no precedent engaged.

What the court decided

AI extract

Srinivas Waste Management Vs Commissioner — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

WP No. 6576 of 2025

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 02-07-2025

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE N. MALA

¶6

WP No. 6576 of 2025

¶7

1. Srinivas Waste Management

¶8

Represented By Its Director, S. Sankranarayanan S/o. T.Srinivasan (late), Havind Its Registeredoffice, F3 Harony Enclave No.8 Mp Avenue, Abusali Street, Saligramam, Chennai 600 093

Petitioner(s)

1. COMMISSIONER

Salem Muncipal Corporation, Salem

¶13

Respondent(s)

¶14

PRAYER

¶15

Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ of mandamus DIRECTING THE RESPONDENT CORPORATION herein to release the balance outstanding payment of RS.3,95,34,342/- dure and payable to the petitiner herien for the service provided by the petitioner company for collection segregation and transporation of Municipal wastes for the period between july 2014 till january 2019 in the

¶16

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶17

WP No. 6576 of 2025

¶18

respondent corporation pursuant to the various representations sent y the petitioner herein and pas per the order made b the Tamilnadu urban local bodies ombuds man by its order no. 1116/Ma/2023 dated 22.05.23 within such suitable me as may be prescribed by this court.

¶19

For Petitioner(s): Mr.N.Damodaran

¶20

For Respondent(s): Mrs.N.Devi Standing Counsel For Respondent

¶21

ORDER

¶22

(1) The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to

¶23

withdraw this writ petition and he has also made the following endorsement

¶24

in the petition to that effect: