Disposed¶18

K.Mariyammal v. the State Rep by

Madras HC20 Feb 2025WP/5390/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Madras High Court; W.P.No.5390 of 2025; K.Mariyammal v. District Registrar Dharmapuri, Tahsildar Harur, Sub Registrar Morapoor, Akilan, Muniyammal; writ of mandamus under Article 226; consideration of representation/objection dated 20.11.2024; restraint on registration of documents; well and land in Survey No.38/3A; disposed of on 20.02.2025 recording Government Advocate's submission; Judge N. Anand Venkatesh.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition disposed of by recording the Government Advocate's submission that the petitioner's objections will be dealt with as and when documents are presented for registration pertaining to the subject property and the 3rd respondent will take a decision in accordance with law; no costs awarded. ¶18

K.Mariyammal Vs the State Rep by — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 20.02.2025

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH

¶5

W.P.No.5390 of 2025

¶6

K.Mariyammal ... Petitioner

¶7

Vs. 1.The District Registrar, Office of the District Registrar, Dharmapuri District. 2.The Tahsildar, Office of the Tahsildar, Harur, Dharmapuri District. 3.The Sub Registrar, Office of the Sub Registrar, Morapoor, Dharmapuri District. 4.Akilan 5.Muniyammal ... Respondents

¶8

Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st and 3rd Respondents to consider and dispose of the Representation given by the petitioner dated 20.11.2024, seeking a direction to refrain from registering any transaction concerning the property comprising the well and land in Survey No.38/3A within a time frame stipulated by this Court.

¶9

1/4

¶10

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶11

For Petitioner : Mr.D.Mario Johnson For Respondents : Mr.P.harish Government Advocate for R1 to R3

¶12

O R D E R

¶13

This writ petition has been filed for issue of writ of mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 3 to consider the objection/representation given by the petitioner on 20.11.2024, wherein, the petitioner is objecting to entertaining any documents presented for registration with respect to the subject property.

¶14

2.Heard Mr.D.Mario Johnson, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mr.P.Harish, learned Government Advocate appearing on behalf of respondents 1 to 3.

¶15

3.The learned Government Advocate appearing on behalf of 1^st and 3^rd respondents submitted that as and when any documents are presented for registration pertaining to the subject property, the objections given by the petitioner will be dealt with and the 3^rd respondent will take a decision in accordance with law.

¶16

2/4

¶17

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶18

4.Recording the above submission, this writ petition is disposed of. No Costs.

¶19

20.02.2025

¶20

Internet : Yes Index : Yes Speaking Order / Non Speaking Order ssr

¶21

¶22