G.E.Jayashankar Vs the Commissioner

Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 3 herein to take

¶18

1/6

¶19

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶20

W.P.No.5124 of 2025

¶21

appropriate and necessary action so as to cancel, nullify, set aside the illegal, unlawful and fraudulent sale deeds dated 05.07.2002 registered and Document No.1313/2002 at the SRO, Periamet and the sale deed dated 12.04.2007 registered as document No.892/2007 at the SRO, Periamet, and the subsequent patta issued in the name of the 4th respondent as well as to recover the property at door No.3, Venkatachala Mudali Street, Choolai Chennai - 600 112 from the 4th respondent and initiate criminal action against the 4th respondent and all those involved in such fraudulent activities within a time frame as may be fixed by this Court.

¶22

For Petitioner : Mr.W.M.Abdul Majeed For R1 to R3 : Mr.N.R.R.Arun Natarajan Special Government Pleader

¶23

ORDER

¶24

In view of the nature of relief that is granted in this writ petition, this writ petition is disposed of at the admission stage itself without notice to the fourth respondent private party, as the rights of the fourth respondent are not determined one way or the other by the order that is proposed to be passed.

¶25

2/6

¶26

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶27

W.P.No.5124 of 2025

¶28

The grievance of the petitioner is that certain properties belonging to the third respondent temple are being dealt with by private persons, including registering the documents and no action has been taken. As such, the petitioner has made a complaint to the first and second respondent authorities, but no action has been taken. Therefore, the present writ petition is filed.

¶29

When the matter came up for hearing, the learned Special Government Pleader appearing on behalf of the first to third respondents, by producing written instructions dated 13.02.2025, submitted that action has already been initiated under Section 78 of the Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act, 1959. The matter is taken up in M.P.No. 6 of 2023 and an enquiry has been conducted. Steps have also been taken with respect to the change of Patta and an application has been made to the Tahsildhar, Purasaiwakkam. The parties have been issued summons for oral enquiry and the parties are appearing. In view thereof, this writ petition is disposed of on the following terms:-

¶30

(i) The first to third respondents authorities shall continue the action in accordance with law. It is needless to

¶31

3/6

¶32

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶33

W.P.No.5124 of 2025

¶34

mention that a notice can also be issued to the petitioner to place whatever documents in his possession with reference to the issue and final orders can be passed, duly securing the temple property, if the property belongs to the temple.

¶35

(ii) Furthermore, all the defences of the fourth respondent are kept open to be raised before the first to third respondents authorities during the course of the enquiry. The first to third respondents authorities shall complete the exercise as expeditiously as possible, in any event not later than a period of four months from the date of receipt/production of website uploaded copy of this order, without waiting for the certified copy of the order.

¶36

(iii) No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶37

14.02.2025

¶38

Neutral Citation: Yes/No nsl

¶39

4/6

¶40

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶41

W.P.No.5124 of 2025