Kandasamy v. the Inspector General of Registrations
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ of Mandamus; recall of ban on registration of deeds of conveyance; Survey Nos.125/A3 & 126/2, Sikkampatti Village, Omalur Taluk, Salem District; Letter Na.Ka.No.9831/98/A3 dated 15.03.2002; Joint Commissioner HR&CE Department Salem; Inspector General of Registration; District Registrar Salem; Sub Registrar Tharamangalam; Executive Officer, Arulmigu Sendraya Perumal Thirukoil; earlier order in W.P.No.37965 of 2024 dated 20.12.2024 enures to petitioner; representations dated 24.08.2023 and 31.12.2024; documents to be entertained for registration; protection of successor in interest; Article 226 Constitution of India; remedy left open to temple Executive Officer.
What did the court decide?
Writ disposed of with a direction to respondents 4 and 5 (District Registrar, Salem and Sub Registrar, Tharamangalam) to entertain documents for registration pertaining to Survey Nos.125/A3 and 126/2; the HR&CE Department's ban letter is not to be used against the petitioner or any successor in interest; the sixth respondent is left free to work out any claimed right in accordance with law; no costs; connected miscellaneous petition (WMP.No.5626 of 2025) closed.