Thyagarajan v. the Commissioner
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition (mandamus, Article 226), Madras HC, disposed 04.12.2025 by Justice P.B. Balaji, no costs. Petitioner Thyagarajan (agriculturist, Nannilam Taluk, Tiruvarur) sought disposal by the HR&CE Commissioner (R1) of his 14.11.2025 representation alleging that hereditary priest Kandhan (R6) took control of Arulmigu Angalamman Parameshwari Aalayam, misappropriated income and made unilateral decisions prejudicial to the village-established temple. Notice to private respondent dispensed with; petition disposed on the Court recording the Additional Government Pleader's undertaking that the Joint Commissioner, Thanjavore (R2) will address the allegations and complaints in a manner known to law. No cases cited; no statutory provisions beyond Article 226.
What did the court decide?
No substantive judicial relief ordered. The Court recorded the Additional Government Pleader's submission that the second respondent (Joint Commissioner, HR&CE, Thanjavore) will address the petitioner's allegations and complaints in a manner known to law, and disposed of the writ petition with no costs.