Disposed¶24

S.Rosaly v. The Assistant Elementary

Madras HC11 Nov 2025WP/4562/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

S. Rosaly; notional increment; superannuation on day preceding annual increment due date 01.07.2013; revision of pension and other benefits; pension revised and disbursed; LFC Primary Aided School, Ranipet; Assistant Elementary Educational Officer, Vellore District; Accountant General (A and E); Article 226 mandamus; Final Order in W.P. No.12322 of 2017 dated 05.07.2017; writ petition closed, no costs; petitioner unrepresented; Madras High Court; Justice K. Surender; non-speaking order.

What did the court decide?

In view of the first respondent counsel's submission that the petitioner's pension had been revised and disbursed, this Court closed the writ petition, imposing no costs, without adjudicating the notional-increment claim afresh. ¶24

S.Rosaly Vs The Assistant Elementary — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

WP No. 4562 of 2018

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 11-11-2025

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K. SURENDER

¶6

WP No. 4562 of 2018

¶7

S.Rosaly Petitioner(s)

¶8

¶9

The Assistant Elementary Educational Officer, Ranipet, Vellore District- 632 401.

¶10

2.The Manager / Correspondent LFC Primary Aided School, Ranipet, Chennai 632 401.

¶11

3.The Accountant General (A and E) Anna Salai, Teynampet, Chennai 18. Respondent(s)

¶12

PRAYER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India seeking Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents to sanction one notional increment to the petitioner who retires on superannuation on the proceeding day of annual increment due date on 01.07.2013 in light of Final Order in W.P. No.12322 of 2017 dated 05.07.2017 accordingly revise the pension and other benefits within a specified period.

¶13

For Petitioner(s): NA

¶14

For Respondent(s): M/s.P.Raja Rajeshwari GA for R1 R2 - NA Mr.L.Murali Kishnan for R3

¶15

ORDER

¶16

This Writ Petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking a direction to

¶17

the respondents to sanction one notional increment to the petitioner and to

¶18

revise the pension and other benefits within a specified period.

¶19

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶20

WP No. 4562 of 2018

¶21

As seen from the docket sheet of the case bundle, there was no representation on 13.02.2024 and 23.02.2024. Even today, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner.

¶22