Poovarasi Vs the District Collector

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing respondents 1 to 4 to take action on the petitioner's complaints dated 01.09.2024 and 03.09.2024 and remove the illegal encroachments made by the respondents 5 and 6 in the petition property being Government Battai Promboke land comprised in Survey No.99/1, measuring Hectares 0.69.0 ares situated in Kamatchi Amman Kovil Street, Padiyamputhoor Revenue Village, Chinnakallandai Village, Kalasapakkam Taluk, Tiruvannamalai District.

¶24

For Petitioner : Mr.E.Prabhu For Respondents : Mr.M.S.Arasakumar Government Advocate for R1 to R3

¶25

Mr.K.Tamilvendan Government Advocate for R4

¶26

ORDER

¶27

[Order of the Court was made by M.SUNDAR, J .,]

¶28

This order will now dispose of the captioned 'Writ Petition' ['WP' for the sake of brevity].

¶29

Page Nos.2/8

¶30

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶31

W.P.No.39419 of 2024

¶32

Mr.E.Prabhu, learned counsel on record for writ petitioner is before us.

¶33

Adverting to representations dated 01.09.2024 and 03.09.2024, Mr.E.Prabu, learned counsel for writ petitioner submitted that there is alleged encroachment in at 'Survey No.99/1, measuring Hectares 0.69.0 ares situated in Kamatchi Amman Kovil Street, Padiyamputhoor Revenue Village, Chinnakallandai Village, Kalasapakkam Taluk, Tiruvannamalai District' [hereinafter 'said land' for the sake of convenience and clarity] by R5 and R6 before us. To be noted, R5 and R6 are private respondents.

¶34

Considering the obtaining position, we are of the view that the captioned WP can be disposed of by ordering notice to respondents (R1 to R4) and putting in a safety valve / adequate protection qua alleged encroachers i.e., R5 and R6.

¶35

Issue notice to official respondents i.e., R1 to R4.

¶36

Page Nos.3/8

¶37

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶38

W.P.No.39419 of 2024

¶39

Mr.M.S.Arasakumar, learned Government Advocate accepts notice for R1 to R3 and Mr.K.Tamilvendan, learned Government Advocate accepts notice for R4.

¶40

In the light of what has been alluded to supra and considering the limited scope of the captioned WP, with the consent of both sides, main WP was taken up.

¶41

It was submitted by learned Government Advocate that G.O.(Ms)No.64, Revenue and Disaster Management Department, Land Disposal Wing, dated 08.02.2022 has been put in place, wherein and whereby Divisional Monitoring Committee, District Monitoring Committee and State Steering Committee have been constituted inter alia for a single point reporting / monitoring system qua Government lands.

¶42

In the light of the narrative thus far, we deem it appropriate to refer the matter to the Divisional Monitoring Committee headed by Revenue Divisional Officer (RDO), Arni Town, in the light of G.O.(Ms)No.64, Revenue and Disaster Management Department, Land Disposal Wing, dated 08.02.2022.

¶43

Page Nos.4/8

¶44

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶45

W.P.No.39419 of 2024

¶46

This Court directs the jurisdictional Divisional Monitoring Committee to examine if there is encroachment qua said land. The Divisional Monitoring Committee shall also ensure that adequate and ample opportunity is given to persons concerned more particularly alleged encroachers (R5 and R6) before taking a call. In this regard, we are acutely conscious that the matter is being disposed of in Admission Board without notice to alleged encroachers and therefore, this safety valve is put in place. To be noted, all the rights and contentions of alleged encroachers are preserved for being raised before the Committee concerned which shall consider the same on its own merits and in accordance with law untrammelled by this proceedings in this Court,within a period of twelve weeks from today i.e., by 27.03.2025.

¶47

The Divisional Monitoring Committee qua G.O.(Ms)No.64, Revenue and Disaster Management Department, Land Disposal Wing, dated 08.02.2022, shall (if it comes to the conclusion that there is encroachment) report the encroachment for further action (for removal of encroachment which again shall be after giving adequate and ample opportunity to alleged encroachers).

¶48

Page Nos.5/8

¶49

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶50

W.P.No.39419 of 2024

¶51

It is open to the WP petitioner and/ or anyone concerned

¶52

with this matter to come to this Court on the same issue even with a similar / same prayer if there are any change of circumstances.

¶53

We make it clear that we have not expressed any view or opinion as to whether there is encroachment or not qua said land as it turns on facts and it is for the Divisional Monitoring Committee to take a call on this aspect of the matter. We also make it clear that this exercise will not apply to patta land and it will apply only to public land, if there is any encroachment in public land.

¶54