Dismissed¶¶24

A.Indira Antony Mary, v. The State of Tamil Nadu

Madras HC9 Oct 2025WP/38956/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Madras High Court order dismissing writ petition as withdrawn after death of petitioner (06.02.2019); Article 226 certiorari-mandamus petition against three District Elementary Education Officer, Cuddalore orders (24.06.2012, 12.02.2016, 29.08.2016) seeking reinstatement left unadjudicated; no costs; connected WMPs closed; decided 09-10-2025 by K. Surender, J.; no issues framed or precedents cited.

What did the court decide?

Leave to withdraw granted; writ petition dismissed as withdrawn with no costs; connected miscellaneous petitions (WMP.Nos.33363 to 33365 of 2016 and WMP.No.5000 of 2017) closed. ¶¶24

A.Indira Antony Mary, Vs The State of Tamil Nadu — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

WP No. 38956 of 2016

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 09-10-2025

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K. SURENDER

¶6

WP No. 38956 of 2016 and WMP.Nos.33363 to 33365 of 2016 and WMP.No.5000 of 2017

¶7

A.Indira Antony Mary,

¶8

Petitioner(s)

¶9

¶10

The State of Tamil Nadu Reptd. by the Secretary, Education Department, Fort St. George, Chennai

¶11

2.The Director of Elementary Education, College Road, Chennai-600 006

¶12

3.The District Elementary Education Officer, O/o. The District Elementary Education Officer, Cuddalore District, Cuddalore

¶13

Respondent(s) PRAYER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, seeking Writ of Certiorari Mandamus to call for records relating to order vide R.C. No.2579/ A7/ 2012 dated 24.06.2012, order vide Na. Ka. No.2579/ B4/ 2012 dated 12.02.2016 and order vide Na.Ka. No.2579/ B4/ 2012 dated 29.08.2016 passed by the 3rd Respondent and quash the same and direct the 3rd Respondent to reinstate the Petitioner into service with all consequential benefits.

¶14

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶15

WP No. 38956 of 2016

¶16

For Petitioner(s): M/s.Giridhar and Sai

¶17

For Respondent(s): M/s.P.Rajarajeshwari, GA

¶18

ORDER

¶19

The learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo stating that the

¶20

petitioner was passed away on 06.02.2019 and her legal heirs are also not interested to prosecute the case and sought leave of this court to withdraw the

¶21

Writ Petition and he has also made an endorsement in the case bundle to that

¶22

effect.

¶23